Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care : a Queensland case


Autoria(s): Lawrence, Sean; Willmott, Lindy; Miligan, Eleanor; Winch, Sarah; White, Benjamin P.; Parker, Malcolm
Data(s)

02/04/2012

Resumo

Findings from a Queensland coronial inquest highlight the complex clinical, ethical and legal issues that arise in end-of-life care when clinicians and family members disagree about a diagnosis of clinical futility. The tension between the law and best medical practice is highlighted in this case, as doctors are compelled to seek family consent to not commence a futile intervention. Good communication between doctors and families, as well as community and professional education, is essential to resolve tensions that can arise when there is disagreement about treatment at the end of life.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50303/

Publicador

Australasian Medical Publishing Company

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50303/1/50303S.pdf

DOI:10.5694/mja10.10969

Lawrence, Sean, Willmott, Lindy, Miligan, Eleanor, Winch, Sarah, White, Benjamin P., & Parker, Malcolm (2012) Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care : a Queensland case. Medical Journal of Australia, 196(6), pp. 404-405.

http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/LP120100096

Direitos

Copyright 2012 Please consult the authors.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #110310 Intensive Care #180119 Law and Society #Medical futility #End of life decision-making #Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment #Adult guardianship law #Health communication #Medical ethics #Health law
Tipo

Journal Article