Visual acuity is not what it seems : on Ian Burn's 'Late' reflections


Autoria(s): McNamara, Andrew E.
Contribuinte(s)

Stephen, Ann

Data(s)

2010

Resumo

A whole tradition is said to be based on the hierarchical distinction between the perceptual and conceptual. In art, Niklas Luhmann argues, this schism is played out and repeated in conceptual art. This paper complicates this depiction by examining Ian Burn's last writings in which I argue the artist-writer reviews the challenge of minimal-conceptual art in terms of its perceptual pre-occupations. Burn revisits his own work and the legacy of minimal-conceptual by moving away from the kind of ideology critique he is best known for internationally in order to reassert the long overlooked visual-perceptual preoccupations of the conceptual in art.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50166/

Publicador

Institute of Modern Art

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50166/1/2012003166.pdf

http://www.ima.org.au/pages/publishing.php

McNamara, Andrew E. (2010) Visual acuity is not what it seems : on Ian Burn's 'Late' reflections. In Stephen, Ann (Ed.) Mirror Mirror : Then and Now. Institute of Modern Art, Brisbane, QLD, pp. 24-32.

Fonte

Creative Industries Faculty; School of Media, Entertainment & Creative Arts

Palavras-Chave #190100 ART THEORY AND CRITICISM #190500 VISUAL ARTS AND CRAFTS #Minimalism #Conceptual Art #contemporary art #perception
Tipo

Book Chapter