Parrhesia and democracy : Truthtelling, WikiLeaks and the Arab Spring
Data(s) |
2011
|
---|---|
Resumo |
Parrhesia — the practice of truth-telling — was adapted to various ancient legal, political, philosophical and religious contexts. In this essay we focus on parrhesia in politics and its relevance for democracy, concentrating on the account given by Michel Foucault. We suggest that Foucault’s approach to parrhesia and democracy is valuable because of its stress on the analysis of governmental rationalities and the ethical comportment of citizens, rather than on the normative dimensions of democracy, as is more usual (but more sterile) in political thought. We take two modern examples of truth-telling’s role in democracy – the recent WikiLeaks scandal and the political struggles in Tunisia and Egypt – as a way of assessing the value of Foucault’s distinctive approach and the relevance of parrhesia for democracy today. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Social Alternatives |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/49683/2/49683.pdf http://www.socialalternatives.com/issues/challenging-contemporary-democracy Sauter, Theresa & Kendall, Gavin P. (2011) Parrhesia and democracy : Truthtelling, WikiLeaks and the Arab Spring. Social Alternatives, 30(3), pp. 10-14. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2011 Social Alternatives. |
Fonte |
Division of Research and Commercialisation; Faculty of Education |
Palavras-Chave | #160806 Social Theory #220316 Philosophy of Specific Cultures (incl. Comparative Philosophy) #Democracy #Michel Foucault #Parrhesia #Wikileaks #Arab Spring |
Tipo |
Journal Article |