Evaluation of design-builder qualifications through the analysis of Requests for Qualifications (RFQs)


Autoria(s): Xia, Bo; Skitmore, Martin; Zuo, Jian
Data(s)

2012

Resumo

The two-phrase best-value process has been widely used by public agencies for Design and Build (DB) procurement, with a key issue in the first phase of pre-qualification being the determination of evaluation criteria. This study identified a set of general qualification criteria for design-builders and compares their relative importance by a thorough content analysis of 97 Requests for Qualification (RFQ) for public DB projects advertised between 2000 and 2011 in various regions of the USA. The thirty-nine qualification criteria found are summarized and classified into eight categories comprising: experience; project understanding and approach; organizational structure and capacity; past performance record; professional qualifications; responsiveness to RFQs, office location and familiarity with local environment; and legal status in descending order of their relative importance. A comparative analysis of different types of projects shows that the relative weightings of the qualification criteria vary according to different characteristics of the DB projects involved.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48624/

Publicador

American Society of Civil Engineers

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48624/1/ASCE_JME_Evaluation_of_design-builder_qualificatoins.pdf

DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000095

Xia, Bo, Skitmore, Martin, & Zuo, Jian (2012) Evaluation of design-builder qualifications through the analysis of Requests for Qualifications (RFQs). Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(3), pp. 348-351.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers

Fonte

School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment; Science & Engineering Faculty

Palavras-Chave #120000 BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN #Design/Build #content analysis #request for qualification
Tipo

Journal Article