Practice and Procedure. Self-executing order - construction - whether further judicial at required for self-executing order to take effect
Data(s) |
01/03/2011
|
---|---|
Resumo |
In Mango Boulevard Pty Ltd v Spencer [2010] QCA 207, a self-executing order had been made in consequence of continuing default by parties to the proceedings in meeting their disclosure obligations. The case involved several questions about the construction and implications of the self-executing order. This note focuses on the aspects of the case relating to that order. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48376/2/48376.pdf http://www.qls.com.au/content/lwp/wcm/connect/QLS/Knowledge%20Centre/Newsletters,%20Magazines%20and%20Journals/Proctor/ Jackson, Sheryl (2011) Practice and Procedure. Self-executing order - construction - whether further judicial at required for self-executing order to take effect. Proctor, 31(2), pp. 42-43. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2011 Sheryl Jackson |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law; Law and Justice Research Centre; School of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #self-executing order - construction #abuse of process #practice and procedure #Mango Boulevard Pty Ltd v Spencer |
Tipo |
Journal Article |