Practice and Procedure. Self-executing order - construction - whether further judicial at required for self-executing order to take effect


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl
Data(s)

01/03/2011

Resumo

In Mango Boulevard Pty Ltd v Spencer [2010] QCA 207, a self-executing order had been made in consequence of continuing default by parties to the proceedings in meeting their disclosure obligations. The case involved several questions about the construction and implications of the self-executing order. This note focuses on the aspects of the case relating to that order.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48376/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48376/2/48376.pdf

http://www.qls.com.au/content/lwp/wcm/connect/QLS/Knowledge%20Centre/Newsletters,%20Magazines%20and%20Journals/Proctor/

Jackson, Sheryl (2011) Practice and Procedure. Self-executing order - construction - whether further judicial at required for self-executing order to take effect. Proctor, 31(2), pp. 42-43.

Direitos

Copyright 2011 Sheryl Jackson

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Law and Justice Research Centre; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #self-executing order - construction #abuse of process #practice and procedure #Mango Boulevard Pty Ltd v Spencer
Tipo

Journal Article