Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency
| Data(s) |
01/06/2011
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
This article considers the implications of the decision in Clayton Utz Lawyers v P & W Enterprises Pty Ltd [2011] QDC 5, and the meaning of "itemised bill" as defined in the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld). |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc. |
| Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48196/3/48196.pdf http://www.qls.com.au/content/lwp/wcm/connect/QLS/Knowledge%20Centre/Newsletters,%20Magazines%20and%20Journals/Proctor/ Jackson, Sheryl (2011) Devil's in the detail : judgment highlights need for invoice transparency. Proctor, 31(5), pp. 46-47. |
| Direitos |
Copyright 2011 the author. |
| Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
| Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #Legal Profession Act 2007 #itemised bill #Clayton Utz v P & W Enterprises #Practice and Procedure |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
