District Court debt decisions
| Data(s) |
01/05/2011
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
This article examines the distinction between a "liquidated demand" and a claim for "unliquidated damages" and the implications of that distinction on the procedure for obtaining a judgment if the defendant fails to file a notice of intention to defend. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc |
| Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48195/1/48195_authorVersion.pdf http://www.qls.com.au/content/lwp/wcm/connect/QLS/Knowledge+Centre/Library+Services/Online+Catalogue+&+Requests/Search+the+Proctor+Index Jackson, Sheryl (2011) District Court debt decisions. Proctor, 31(4), pp. 50-51. |
| Direitos |
Copyright 2011 Queensland Law Society Inc |
| Fonte |
Faculty of Law; Law and Justice Research Centre; School of Law |
| Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #liquidated demand #unliquidated damages #default judgment #practice and procedure #Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 284 |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
