The Commercial Surrogacy Dilemma


Autoria(s): Trowse, Pip
Data(s)

2011

Resumo

In November 2009 the England and Wales High Court (Family Division) granted a parental order pursuant to s30 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 in respect of twins who came to be in the custody and control of the applicants (Mr and Mrs A) through a surrogacy arrangement. The particularly unusual and interesting aspect of this case is that, on the evidence, Mr and Mrs A had paid expenses to the surrogate above and beyond those allowed by the legislation, thus creating a commercial surrogacy arrangement. Commercial surrogacy arrangements involve the payment of money to the surrogate mother in excess of those expenses which have been reasonably incurred pursuant to the surrogacy arrangement. This case is relevant to Queensland law because commercial surrogacy arrangements are also prohibited in Queensland and, as in the United Kingdom, the court cannot make a parentage order unless it is satisfied the surrogacy arrangement is not a commercial surrogacy arrangement.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/47088/

Publicador

Thomson Reuters (Australia/NZ)

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/47088/2/47088.pdf

http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/the-queensland-lawyer/

Trowse, Pip (2011) The Commercial Surrogacy Dilemma. The Queensland Lawyer, 31(3), pp. 160-162.

Direitos

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #Surrogacy #Commercial #Parentage Order
Tipo

Journal Article