Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement : teachers’ views


Autoria(s): Connolly, Stephen; Klenowski, Valentina; Wyatt-Smith, Claire
Data(s)

2012

Resumo

Major curriculum and assessment reforms in Australia have generated research interest in issues related to standards, teacher judgement and moderation. This article is based on one related inquiry of a large-scale Australian Research Council Linkage project conducted in Queensland. This qualitative study analysed interview data to identify teachers’ views on standards and moderation as a means to achieving consistency of teacher judgement. A complementary aspect of the research involved a blind review that was conducted to determine the degree of teacher consistency without the experience of moderation. Empirical evidence was gained that most teachers, of the total interviewed, articulated a positive attitude towards the use of standards in moderation and perceived that this process produces consistency in teachers’ judgements. Context was identified as an important influential factor in teachers’ judgements and it was concluded that teachers’ assessment beliefs, attitudes and practices impact on their perceptions of the value of moderation practice and the extent to which consistency can be achieved.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/43600/

Publicador

Taylor and Francis

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/43600/1/43600.pdf

DOI:10.1080/01411926.2011.569006

Connolly, Stephen, Klenowski, Valentina, & Wyatt-Smith, Claire (2012) Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement : teachers’ views. British Educational Research Journal, 38(4), pp. 593-614.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 British Educational Research Association

Fonte

Office of Education Research; School of Cultural & Professional Learning; Faculty of Education

Palavras-Chave #130303 Education Assessment and Evaluation #Moderation #standards #teacher judgment
Tipo

Journal Article