Influence of biochars on flux of N2O and CO2 from Ferrosol


Autoria(s): Van Zwieten, Lukas; Kimber, Stephen; Morris, S.; Downie, Adriana; Berger, E.; Rust, Josh; Scheer, Clemens
Data(s)

2010

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/42765/

Publicador

CSIRO Publishing

Relação

DOI:10.1071/SR10004

Van Zwieten, Lukas, Kimber, Stephen, Morris, S., Downie, Adriana, Berger, E., Rust, Josh, & Scheer, Clemens (2010) Influence of biochars on flux of N2O and CO2 from Ferrosol. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 48(6 - 7), pp. 555-568.

Fonte

Faculty of Science and Technology; Institute for Sustainable Resources

Palavras-Chave #050000 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES #060000 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES #070000 AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCES #nitrous oxide, soil properties, biochar, greenwaste, poultry litter, biosolids, papermill, slow pyrolysis, mechanism
Tipo

Journal Article

Resumo

<p>Biochars produced by slow pyrolysis of greenwaste (GW), poultry litter (PL), papermill waste (PS), and biosolids (BS) were shown to reduce N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from an acidic Ferrosol. Similar reductions were observed for the untreated GW feedstock. Soil was amended with biochar or feedstock giving application rates of 1 and 5%. Following an initial incubation, nitrogen (N) was added at 165 kg/ha as urea. Microcosms were again incubated before being brought to 100% water-filled porosity and held at this water content for a further 47 days. The flooding phase accounted for the majority (<80%) of total N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The control soil released 3165 mg N<sub>2</sub>O-N/m<sup>2</sup>, or 15.1% of the available N as N<sub>2</sub>O. Amendment with 1 and 5% GW feedstock significantly reduced emissions to 1470 and 636 mg N<sub>2</sub>O-N/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. This was equivalent to 8.6 and 3.8% of applied N. The GW biochar produced at 350°C was least effective in reducing emissions, resulting in 1625 and 1705 mg N<sub>2</sub>O-N/m<sup>2</sup> for 1 and 5% amendments. Amendment with BS biochar at 5% had the greatest impact, reducing emissions to 518 mg N<sub>2</sub>O-N/m<sup>2</sup>, or 2.2% of the applied N over the incubation period. Metabolic activity as measured by CO<sub>2</sub> production could not explain the differences in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions between controls and amendments, nor could NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> or NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> concentrations in biochar-amended soils. A decrease in NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> following GW feedstock application is likely to have been responsible for reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from this amendment. Reduction in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from the biochar-amended soils was attributed to increased adsorption of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>. Small reductions are possible due to improved aeration and porosity leading to lower levels of denitrification and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Alternatively, increased pH was observed, which can drive denitrification through to dinitrogen during soil flooding.</p>