Mental harm, rescuers and the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)


Autoria(s): Carver, Tracey
Data(s)

09/09/2010

Resumo

At common law, a duty of care may be owed to a claimant who suffers nervous shock or pure mental harm due to witnessing, or hearing about, physical injury caused to another due to a defendant’s negligence. “Pure mental harm” is the ‘impairment of a person’s mental condition’ that is not suffered as a consequence of any other kind of personal injury to them. However, as many accidents have the potential to create a wide circle of mental suffering to bystanders, family members or others not physically injured themselves, it has traditionally been ‘thought impolitic that everybody so affected should be able to recover damages from the tortfeasor.’ ‘To allow such extended recovery would stretch liability too far.’ Nevertheless, whilst adopting a restrictive approach to liability, the common law courts have recognised that a defendant might owe a duty in relation to the pure mental harm suffered by one who foreseeably attends an accident scene to rescue another from a situation created by the defendant’s negligence.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/40893/

Publicador

CCH Australia Limited

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/40893/1/c40893.pdf

http://www.cch.com.au/au/OnlineStore/ProductDetails.aspx?PageTitle=Torts-In-Focus&ProductID=1479#Feature

Carver, Tracey (2010) Mental harm, rescuers and the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). Torts in Focus, 85, pp. 1-5.

Direitos

Copyright 2010 CCH Australia Limited

Reproduced with the permission of CCH Australia Limited. Originally published in the Tort in Focus, 2010, 85, 1-5. For more information see www.cch.com.au

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #duty of care #rescuers #civil liability act #mental harm #psychological harm
Tipo

Journal Article