The peer-to-patent initiative : revitalizing patent examination with peer review


Autoria(s): Fitzgerald, Brian F.; McEniery, Benjamin J.; Webbink, Mark H.
Data(s)

01/09/2010

Resumo

Every day we hear someone complain that this or that patent should not have been granted. People complain that the patent system is now a threat to existing business and innovation be- cause the patent office grants with alarming regularity patents for inventions that are neither novel nor non-obvious. People argue that the patent office cannot keep up with the job of examining the backlog of hundreds of thousands of patents and that, even if it could, the large volumes of prior art literature that need to be considered each time a patent application is received make the decision as to whether a patent should be granted or not a treacherous one.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/37275/

Publicador

National Council of University Research Administrators

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/37275/1/c37275a.pdf

http://www.ncura.edu/content/news/rmr/

Fitzgerald, Brian F., McEniery, Benjamin J., & Webbink, Mark H. (2010) The peer-to-patent initiative : revitalizing patent examination with peer review. NCURA Magazine.

Direitos

Copyright in the text is owned by Ben McEniery and Brian Fitzgerald

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Law and Justice Research Centre

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #180115 Intellectual Property Law #patent #intellectual property #peer to patent #law #examination
Tipo

Journal Article