Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption


Autoria(s): McBratney, Amanda; Nielsen, Katherine; McMillan, Fiona
Data(s)

01/08/2004

Resumo

Lawmakers are asking whether Australian researchers need an express 'experimental use' defense against patent infringement. The overriding policy for establishing a patent system is indisputably the promotion of innovation. According to traditional intellectual property pedagogy, the incentive to innovate flows from the reward afforded to the inventor. A balancing policy is that the patentee must fully disclose the invention to help minimize the risks of duplication and provides a basis for improvements by further research.Where there is uncertainty as to how these competing policy limbs are balanced and whether a patentee can exclude others from experimenting on a patented invention, the uncertain legal environment disadvantages both the patentee and researcher. Different jurisdictions have treated the experimental use question quite differently with varied results for the researcher. The biotechnology industry is evolving at an unprecedented pace and the law will as is always the case, lag behind in its usual cautious fashion. The Australian law may finally catch up to researchers' concerns.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/33112/

Publicador

Nature Publishing Group

Relação

DOI:10.1038/nbt0804-1023

McBratney, Amanda, Nielsen, Katherine, & McMillan, Fiona (2004) Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption. Nature Biotechnology, 22(8), pp. 1023-1025.

Fonte

QUT Business School; School of Accountancy

Palavras-Chave #180115 Intellectual Property Law #Patent Law #Australia
Tipo

Journal Article