United States still no closer to database legislation


Autoria(s): McBratney, Amanda
Data(s)

2000

Resumo

Last year European Intellectual Property Review published an article comparing the latest version of the proposed US database legislation, the Collections of Information Antipiracy Bill with the UK's Copyright and Rights in Database Regulations 1997. Subsequently a new US Bill, the Consumer and Investor Access to Information Act has emerged, the Antipiracy Bill has been amended and much debate has occurred, but the US seems no closer to enacting database legislation. This article briefly outlines the background to the US legislative efforts, examines the two Bills and draws some comparisons with the UK Regulations. A study of the US Bills clearly demonstrates the starkly divided opinion on database protection held by the Bills' proponents and the principal lobby groups driving the legislative efforts: the Antipiracy Bill is very protective of database producers' interests, whereas the Access Bill is heavily user-oriented. If the US experience is any indication there will be a long horizon involved in achieving any consensus on international harmonisation of this difficult area.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/33080/

Publicador

Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.

Relação

http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=460&productid=7061

McBratney, Amanda (2000) United States still no closer to database legislation. European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 366-372.

Fonte

QUT Business School; School of Accountancy

Palavras-Chave #180115 Intellectual Property Law #Intellectual Property Law #United States #United Kingdom #Legislation
Tipo

Journal Article