Preliminary review of over-regulation in Australian financial services
Data(s) |
2006
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This article examines a preliminary review and the limited evidence of over-regulation in Australian financial services. The 1997 Wallis Report and the CLERP 6 paper resulted in the amendments to Ch 7 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by the Financial Services Reform Act. Nearly a decade later the system based upon 'one-size fits all' dual track regime and a consistent licensing regime has greatly increased the costs of compliance. In the area of enforcement there has not been a dramatic change to the effective techniques applied by ASIC over other agencies such as APRA. In particular there are clear economic arguments, as well as international experiences which state that a single financial services regulator is more effective than the multi-layered approach adopted in Australia. Finally, in the superannuation area of financial services, which is worth A$800 billion there is unnecessary dual licensing and duplicated regulation with little evidence of any consumer-member benefit but at a much greater cost |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
LexisNexis Butterworths |
Relação |
Adams, Michael A., Young, Angus, & Nehme, Marina (2006) Preliminary review of over-regulation in Australian financial services. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, pp. 1-17. |
Fonte |
QUT Business School; School of Accountancy |
Palavras-Chave | #180109 Corporations and Associations Law #180119 Law and Society #Financial regulations #Australia #Regulatory reform #Dual track regime |
Tipo |
Journal Article |