Preliminary review of over-regulation in Australian financial services


Autoria(s): Adams, Michael A.; Young, Angus; Nehme, Marina
Data(s)

2006

Resumo

This article examines a preliminary review and the limited evidence of over-regulation in Australian financial services. The 1997 Wallis Report and the CLERP 6 paper resulted in the amendments to Ch 7 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by the Financial Services Reform Act. Nearly a decade later the system based upon 'one-size fits all' dual track regime and a consistent licensing regime has greatly increased the costs of compliance. In the area of enforcement there has not been a dramatic change to the effective techniques applied by ASIC over other agencies such as APRA. In particular there are clear economic arguments, as well as international experiences which state that a single financial services regulator is more effective than the multi-layered approach adopted in Australia. Finally, in the superannuation area of financial services, which is worth A$800 billion there is unnecessary dual licensing and duplicated regulation with little evidence of any consumer-member benefit but at a much greater cost

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/32301/

Publicador

LexisNexis Butterworths

Relação

Adams, Michael A., Young, Angus, & Nehme, Marina (2006) Preliminary review of over-regulation in Australian financial services. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, pp. 1-17.

Fonte

QUT Business School; School of Accountancy

Palavras-Chave #180109 Corporations and Associations Law #180119 Law and Society #Financial regulations #Australia #Regulatory reform #Dual track regime
Tipo

Journal Article