Freedom of information implications of information sharing networks for critical infrastructure protection


Autoria(s): Clapperton, Dale; Corones, Stephen; Hedge, Susan; Lane, Bill
Data(s)

2008

Resumo

Protection of “critical infrastructure” has become a major issue for govern- ments worldwide. Yet in Australia, as in many other countries, including the United States, an estimated 90% of critical infrastructure is privately owned or operated commercially – in other words, critical infrastructure protection is not the exclusive domain of government. As a result, information sharing between government and the private sector has become a vitally important component of effective risk management. However, establishing effective arrangements of this kind between the public and private sector needs to take account of existing regimes of access and public disclosure which relate to government-held documents; in particular, that which is established by freedom of information (FOI) legislation. This article examines the extent to which the current Commonwealth FOI regime is likely to act as an impediment to the private sector operators of critical infrastructure participat- ing in government-operated information sharing arrangements. By examining developments in other jurisdictions, principally the United States, the article considers whether amendments to the current Australian FOI regime are necessary to ensure effective participation, consistent with the underlying object and purpose of FOI.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/30803/

Publicador

Thomson Lawbook Co.

Relação

Clapperton, Dale, Corones, Stephen, Hedge, Susan, & Lane, Bill (2008) Freedom of information implications of information sharing networks for critical infrastructure protection. Australian Journal of Administrative Law, 15(4), pp. 193-212.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #180103 Administrative Law #Freedom Of Information, Security, Administrative Law, Critical Infrastructure
Tipo

Journal Article