Assessing information systems success models : empirical comparison (Research in Progress)


Autoria(s): Rabaa'i, Ahmad A.
Data(s)

02/12/2009

Resumo

Information System (IS) success may be the most arguable and important dependent variable in the IS field. The purpose of the present study is to address IS success by empirically assess and compare DeLone and McLean’s (1992) and Gable’s et al. (2008) models of IS success in Australian Universities context. The two models have some commonalities and several important distinctions. Both models integrate and interrelate multiple dimensions of IS success. Hence, it would be useful to compare the models to see which is superior; as it is not clear how IS researchers should respond to this controversy.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29834/

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29834/1/c29834.pdf

http://infotech.monash.edu/about/news/conferences/acis09/proceedings.html

Rabaa'i, Ahmad A. (2009) Assessing information systems success models : empirical comparison (Research in Progress). In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Caulfield Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, pp. 447-455.

Direitos

Copyright 2009 Rabaa'i, Ahmad A.

The authors assign to ACIS and educational and non-profit institutions a non-exclusive licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to ACIS to publish this document in full in the Conference Papers and Proceedings. Those documents may be published on the World Wide Web, CD-ROM, in printed form, and on mirror sites on the World Wide Web. Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the authors.

Fonte

Faculty of Science and Technology

Palavras-Chave #080600 INFORMATION SYSTEMS #Enterprise Systems #Information Systems #IS-Impact #IS-Success #Australian Universities
Tipo

Conference Paper