The implication of a term of good faith in commercial leases — A brief response


Autoria(s): Dixon, William M.
Data(s)

2003

Resumo

By way of response to Professor Duncan's article,1 this article examines the theoretical basis for the implication of contractual terms, particularly the implication of a term at law. In this regard the recent decision of Barrett J in Overlook v Foxtel [2002] NSWSC 17 is considered, to the extent that it provides guidance concerning the implication of an obligation of good faith in the context of a commercial contract. A number of observations are made which may be considered likely to have application to the relationship of commercial landlord and tenant. The conclusion reached is that although the commercial landlord and tenant contractual relationship is highly regulated, this may not deny a remedy to a tenant who is the victim of a landlord's 'bad faith'. Finally, the article concludes by considering the extent to which it may be possible to contractually exclude the implied obligation of good faith.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/26387/

Publicador

LexisNexis Butterworths

Relação

http://www.lexisnexis.com.au/aus/products/catalog/current_htm/APLJ.asp

Dixon, William M. (2003) The implication of a term of good faith in commercial leases — A brief response. Australian Property Law Journal, 10(1), pp. 19-26.

Direitos

Copyright 2003 LexisNexis Butterworths

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW
Tipo

Journal Article