Perceptions of Integration: What the Literature Says and What Stakeholders See


Autoria(s): Kerr, Gayle
Contribuinte(s)

Podnar, K

Jancic, Z

Data(s)

2006

Resumo

This paper compares perceptions of integrated marketing communication (IMC) to establish whether consumers perceive integration in the same way as the literature. It begins by reviewing the literature to identify shared assumptions about integration and factors thought to contribute to the integration of marketing communication and, in an experiment, compares these with the perceptions of consumers. Many of the shared assumptions in the literature have been supported by the findings of this study. Integration has been demonstrated to be both a strategy and a tactic. The strategic side is part of a management process and is unable to be observed by consumers from the marketing communication output. Consumers can, however, identify the tactics and are able to recall a number of integration factors such as logo, corporate colours and image. Consumers in the total message integration groups perceived the messages they received as more integrated than those in partial integration or no integration groups.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/25215/

Publicador

University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/25215/1/25215.pdf

Kerr, Gayle (2006) Perceptions of Integration: What the Literature Says and What Stakeholders See. In Podnar, K & Jancic, Z (Eds.) Contemporary Issues in Corporate and Marketing Communications: Towards a Socially Responsible Future, 21-22 April 2006, Slovenia, Ljubljana.

Direitos

Copyright 2006 Please consult the authors.

Fonte

QUT Business School; School of Advertising, Marketing & Public Relations

Palavras-Chave #150599 Marketing not elsewhere classified #Integration, Integrated Marketing Communications, Marketing Communications
Tipo

Conference Paper