Definición e implementación de métricas objetivas para la evaluación funcional del miembro superior: aplicación a población con lesión medular cervical

En personas que padecen una Lesión Medular cervical, la función de los miembros superiores se ve afectada en mayor o menor medida, dependiendo fundamentalmente del nivel de la lesión y de la severidad de la misma. El déficit en la función del miembro superior hace que la autonomía e independencia de las personas se vea reducida en la ejecución de Actividades de la Vida Diaria. En el entorno clínico, la valoración de la función del miembro superior se realiza principalmente con escalas clínicas. Algunas de ellas valoran el nivel de dependencia o independencia en la ejecución de Actividades de la Vida Diaria, como, por ejemplo, el índice de Barthel y la escala FIM (Medida de la Independencia Funcional). Otras escalas, como Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function, miden la función del miembro superior valorando la destreza y la habilidad en la ejecución de determinadas tareas funcionales. Estas escalas son generales, es decir, se pueden aplicar a distintas poblaciones de sujetos y a la presencia de distintas patologías. Sin embargo, existen otras escalas desarrolladas específicamente para valorar una patología concreta, con el objetivo de hacer las evaluaciones funcionales más sensibles a cambios. Un ejemplo es la escala Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), desarrollada para valorar Lesión Medular. Las escalas clínicas son instrumentos de medida estandarizados, válidos para su uso en el entorno clínico porque se han validado en muestras grandes de pacientes. No obstante, suelen poseer una elevada componente de subjetividad que depende principalmente de la persona que puntúa el test. Otro aspecto a tener en cuenta, es que la sensibilidad de las escalas es alta, fundamentalmente, a cambios groseros en el estado de salud o en la función del miembro superior, de forma que cambios sutiles en el sujeto pueden no ser detectados. Además, en ocasiones, poseen saturaciones en el sistema de puntuación, de forma que mejorías que se puedan producir por encima de un determinado umbral no son detectadas. En definitiva, estas limitaciones hacen que las escalas clínicas no sean suficientes, por sí mismas, para evaluar estrategias motoras del miembro superior durante la ejecución de movimientos funcionales, siendo necesaria la búsqueda de instrumentos de medida que aporten objetividad, complementen las valoraciones y, al mismo tiempo, intenten solventar las limitaciones que poseen las escalas. Los estudios biomecánicos son ejemplos de métodos objetivos, en los que diversas tecnologías se pueden utilizar para recoger información de los sujetos. Una concreción de estos estudios son los estudios cinemáticos. Mediante tecnología optoelectrónica, inercial o electromagnética, estos estudios proporcionan información objetiva acerca del movimiento realizado por los sujetos, durante la ejecución de tareas concretas. Estos sistemas de medida proporcionan grandes cantidades de datos que carecen de una interpretación inmediata. Estos datos necesariamente deben ser tratados y reducidos a un conjunto de variables que, a priori, posean una interpretación más sencilla para ser utilizados en la práctica clínica. Estas han sido las principales motivaciones de esta investigación. El objetivo principal fue proponer un conjunto de índices cinemáticos que, de forma objetiva, valoren la función del miembro superior; y validar los índices propuestos en poblaciones con Lesión Medular, para su uso como instrumentos de valoración en el entorno clínico. Esta tesis se enmarca dentro de un proyecto de investigación: HYPER (Hybrid Neuroprosthetic and Neurorobotic Devices for Functional Compensation and Rehabilitation of Motor Disorders, referencia CSD2009-00067 CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010). Dentro de este proyecto se lleva a cabo investigación en el desarrollo de modelos, para determinar los requisitos biomecánicos y los patrones de movimiento de los miembros superiores en sujetos sanos y personas con lesión medular. Además, se realiza investigación en la propuesta de nuevos instrumentos de evaluación funcional en el campo de la rehabilitación de los miembros superiores. ABSTRACT In people who have suffered a cervical Spinal Cord Injury, upper limbs function is affected to a greater or lesser extent, depending primarily on the level of the injury and the severity of it. The deficit in the upper limb function reduces the autonomy and independence of persons in the execution of Activities of Daily Living. In the clinical setting, assessment of upper limb function is mainly performed based on clinical scales. Some value the level of dependence or independence in performing activities of daily living, such as the Barthel Index and the FIM scale (Functional Independence Measure). Other scales, such as the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function, measure upper limb function in terms of the skill and ability to perform specific functional tasks. These scales are general, so can be applied to different populations of subjects and the presence of different pathologies. However, there are other scales developed for a specific injury, in order to make the functional assessments more sensitive to changes. An example is the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), developed for people with Spinal Cord Injury. The clinical scales are standardized instruments measure, valid for use in the clinical setting because they have been validated in large patient samples. However, they usually have a high level of subjectivity which mainly depends on the person who scores the test. Another aspect to take into account is the high sensitivity of the scales mainly to gross changes in the health status or upper limb function, so that subtle changes in the subject may not be detected. Moreover, sometimes, have saturations in the scoring system, so that improvements which may occur above a certain threshold are not detected. For these reasons, clinical scales are not enough, by themselves, to assess motor strategies used during movements. So, it’s necessary to find measure instruments that provide objectivity, supplement the assessments and, at the same time, solving the limitations that scales have. Biomechanical studies are examples of objective methods, in which several technologies can be used to collect information from the subjects. One kind of these studies is the kinematic movement analysis. By means of optoelectronics, inertial and electromagnetic technology, these studies provide objective information about the movement performed by the subjects during the execution of specific tasks. These systems provide large quantities of data without easy and intuitive interpretation. These data must necessarily be treated and reduced to a set of variables that, a priori, having a simpler interpretation for their use in the clinical practice. These were the main motivations of this research. The main objective was to propose a set of kinematic indices, or metrics that, objectively, assess the upper limb function and validate the proposed rates in populations with Spinal Cord Injury, for use as assessment tools in the clinical setting. This dissertation is framed within a research project: HYPER (Neurorobotic Devices for Functional Compensation and Rehabilitation of Motor Disorders, grant CSD2009- 00067 CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010). Within this research project, research is conducted in relation to the biomechanical models development for determining the biomechanical requirements and movement patterns of the upper limb in healthy and people with Spinal Cord Injury. Moreover, research is conducted with respect to the proposed of new functional assessment instruments in the field of upper limb rehabilitation.

A prediction model for establishing the disability degree in adults with spinal cord injury: results based on WHO-DAS II perspective

Objective: To establish a prediction model of the degree of disability in adults with Spinal CordInjury (SCI ) based on the use of the WHO-DAS II . Methods: The disability degree was correlatedwith three variable groups: clinical, sociodemographic and those related with rehabilitation services.A model of multiple linear regression was built to predict disability. 45 people with sci exhibitingdiverse etiology, neurological level and completeness participated. Patients were older than 18 andthey had more than a six-month post-injury. The WHO-DAS II and the ASIA impairment scale(AIS ) were used. Results: Variables that evidenced a significant relationship with disability were thefollowing: occupational situation, type of affiliation to the public health care system, injury evolutiontime, neurological level, partial preservation zone, ais motor and sensory scores and number ofclinical complications during the last year. Complications significantly associated to disability werejoint pain, urinary infections, intestinal problems and autonomic disreflexia. None of the variablesrelated to rehabilitation services showed significant association with disability. The disability degreeexhibited significant differences in favor of the groups that received the following services: assistivedevices supply and vocational, job or educational counseling. Conclusions: The best predictiondisability model in adults with sci with more than six months post-injury was built with variablesof injury evolution time, AIS sensory score and injury-related unemployment.

Long-bone fractures in persons with spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective data analysis. OBJECTIVES To document fracture characteristics, management and related complications in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING Rehabilitation centre for SCI individuals. METHOD Patients' records were reviewed. Patients with traumatic SCI and extremity fractures that had occurred after SCI were included. Patient characteristics, fractured bone, fracture localisation, severity and management (operative/conservative), and fracture-related complications were extracted. RESULTS A total of 156 long-bone fractures in 107 SCI patients (34 women and 73 men) were identified. The majority of patients were paraplegics (77.6%) and classified as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A (86.0%). Only the lower extremities were affected, whereby the femur (60.9% of all fractures) was fractured more frequently than the lower leg (39.1%). A total of 70 patients (65.4%) had one fracture, whereas 37 patients (34.6%) had two or more fractures. Simple or extraarticular fractures were most common (75.0%). Overall, 130 (83.3%) fractures were managed operatively. Approximately half of the femur fractures (48.2%) were treated with locking compression plates. In the lower leg, fractures were mainly managed with external fixation (48.8%). Conservative fracture management was applied in 16.7% of the cases and consisted of braces or a well-padded soft cast. Fracture-associated complications were present in 13.5% of the cases but did not differ significantly between operative (13.1%) and conservative (15.4%) fracture management. CONCLUSION SCI was associated with simple or extraarticular fractures of the distal femur and the lower leg. Fractures were mainly managed operatively with a low complication rate.

Utility of the Mild Brain Injury Atypical Symptoms Scale to detect symptom exaggeration : an analogue simulation study

Brief self-report symptom checklists are often used to screen for postconcussional disorder (PCD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and are highly susceptible to symptom exaggeration. This study examined the utility of the five-item Mild Brain Injury Atypical Symptoms Scale (mBIAS) designed for use with the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and the PTSD Checklist–Civilian (PCL–C). Participants were 85 Australian undergraduate students who completed a battery of self-report measures under one of three experimental conditions: control (i.e., honest responding, n = 24), feign PCD (n = 29), and feign PTSD (n = 32). Measures were the mBIAS, NSI, PCL–C, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2, Restructured Form (MMPI–2–RF), and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Participants instructed to feign PTSD and PCD had significantly higher scores on the mBIAS, NSI, PCL–C, and MMPI–2–RF than did controls. Few differences were found between the feign PCD and feign PTSD groups, with the exception of scores on the NSI (feign PCD > feign PTSD) and PCL–C (feign PTSD > feign PCD). Optimal cutoff scores on the mBIAS of ≥8 and ≥6 were found to reflect “probable exaggeration” (sensitivity = .34; specificity = 1.0; positive predictive power, PPP = 1.0; negative predictive power, NPP = .74) and “possible exaggeration” (sensitivity = .72; specificity = .88; PPP = .76; NPP = .85), respectively. Findings provide preliminary support for the use of the mBIAS as a tool to detect symptom exaggeration when administering the NSI and PCL–C.

Adaptação para a população Portuguesa da escala de avaliação Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)

Para uma melhor avaliação e definição do plano de intervenção do indivíduo, é cada vez mais importante a existência instrumentos de avaliação válidos e fiáveis para a população portuguesa. Objetivo: Traduzir e adaptar para a população Portuguesa a escala Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) em pacientes pós-AVE, e avaliar as propriedades psicométricas da mesma. Metodologia: A TIS foi traduzida para o Português e adaptada culturalmente para a população portuguesa. As propriedades psicométricas da mesma, incluindo validade, fiabilidade, concordância inter-observadores, consistência interna, sensibilidade, especificidade, poder de resposta, foram avaliadas numa população diagnosticada com AVE e num grupo de controlo de participantes saudáveis. Participaram neste estudo 80 indivíduos, divididos em dois grupos, nomeadamente indivíduos pós-AVE (40) e um grupo sem patologia (40). Os participantes foram submetidos à aplicação das escalas de Berg, Medida de Independência Funcional e Escala de Desempenho Físico Fugl Meyer e a TIS de modo a avaliar as propriedades psicométricas desta. As avaliações foram realizadas por duas fisioterapeutas experientes e o re-teste foi realizado após 48 horas. Os dados foram registados e trabalhados com o programa informático SPSS 21.0. Resultados: Relativamente aos valores obtidos, verificou-se que, quanto à consistência interna da TIS estes apresentam-se de forma moderada a elevada (alfa Cronbach = 0,909). Quanto à fiabilidade inter-observadores, os itens com menor valor são os itens 1 e 4 (0,759 e 0,527, respetivamente) e os itens com valor de Kappa mais alto são os itens 5 e 6 (0,830 e 0,893, respetivamente). Relativamente à validade de critério, verificou-se que não houve correlação entre a escala de Desempenho Físico Fugl-Meyer, a escala de Equilibrio de Berg e a Medida de Independência Funcional, ou seja, os valores obtidos r=0,166; r=0,017; r= -0,002, respetivamente. Quanto à validade de construção, constatou-se que o valor da mediana é mais elevado nos itens 1 a 5, logo sugere que haja diferenças entre o grupo de indivíduos pós-AVE e o grupo de indivíduos saudáveis (p<0,001). Entre os outros dois itens (6 e 7) não foram encontradas diferenças nas respostas nos dois grupos, sendo o valor de p > 0,001. Conclusão: Os resultados obtidos neste estudo sugerem que a versão portuguesa da TIS apresenta bons níveis de fiabilidade, consistência interna e também apresenta bons resultados no que refere à concordância inter-observadores.

The sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale : a reliable scale for use in clinical physiotherapy

Objective
To evaluate, through two studies, the factor structure, inter-rater agreement, and test–retest and inter-rater reliability of the Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale (SIRAS).

Design
Repeated measures design in both Study 1 (video evaluation) and Study 2 (clinical evaluation).

Setting
University department (Study 1) and outpatient physiotherapy department (Study 2).

Participants
Sixty physiotherapists and physiotherapy students in Study 1 and 45 patients undergoing physiotherapy treatment for a musculoskeletal injury in Study 2.

Intervention
In Study 1, participants rated the adherence of a simulated videotaped patient demonstrating high, moderate and low adherence during rehabilitation. In Study 2, two physiotherapists rated the adherence of patients at two consecutive rehabilitation sessions.

Main outcome measure
The SIRAS.

Results
In Study 1, principal components analysis confirmed a single factor for the SIRAS, and inter-rater agreement values ranged from 0.87 to 0.93. In Study 2, inter-rater and test–retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.83] to 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.95), and from 0.63 (95% CI 0.36–0.82) to 0.76 (95% CI 0.55–0.88), respectively.

Conclusion
The SIRAS is a reliable measure with high inter-rater agreement when used to evaluate clinic-based adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation for musculoskeletal injury.

Relationship between function, strength and electromyography of upper extremities of persons with tetraplegia

Study design: Cross-sectional. Objective: To analyze the relationships between functional tests, arm strength and root mean square of surface electromyography (EMG). Setting: Sao Paulo, Brazil. Methods: Twenty-four individuals with chronic tetraplegia participated. Upper extremity motor score (UEMS), functional independence measure (FIM) motor score, spinal cord independence measure III and capabilities of upper extremity (CUE) were performed. Muscle strength of the right elbow flexors-extensors was assessed using dynamometry and manual muscle test (MMT) and EMG of right biceps and triceps brachii were performed. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and Mann-Whitney's U-test were used. Results: Functional tests and UEMS correlated strongly among them. UEMS highly correlated with triceps dynamometry and EMG. The dynamometry showed a very high correlation with MMT on the extensor group and a moderate correlation with flexor group. Triceps EMG showed moderate correlation with FIM and CUE. High correlations between triceps EMG and elbow extensors dynamometry and MMT were observed. A significant better performance on functional tests was observed on lower ASIA motor levels. The low-tetraplegia group showed a significant higher score on triceps EMG and dynamometry. Conclusion: Arm strength and EMG seem to be related to functional capabilities and independence in chronic tetraplegia. Spinal Cord (2012) 50, 28-32; doi:10.1038/sc.2011.95; published online 30 August 2011

Measuring literalism and symbolism in advertisements : scale development and validation

A basic element in advertising strategy is the choice of an appeal. Many researchers have studied communication message form and specifically forms of literalism and symbolism, or some variation. The motives for such study are grounded in increasing the effectiveness of commercial communication messages, especially advertising messages. Advertising research studies typically use forms of literalism (e.g. informativeness) or symbolism (e.g. metaphoric, tropes, schemes figures of speech, and rhetorical figures) as independent variables and compare these against one or more of the traditional advertising effectiveness measures as dependent variable(s). The main challenge in assessing the effectiveness of literalism or symbolism in message content is the discreet identification of the construct. However, no standard, empirically-tested measure was located in the literature.

Validez de apariencia y concurrente de un instrumento de evaluación de la discapacidad en personas con lesión medular crónica, basado en el core set abreviado de la cif

Objetivo. Determinar la validez de apariencia y concurrente de un instrumento de evaluación de la discapacidad en personas con lesión medular crónica (SCI-DAS), basado en el core set abreviadode la CIF. Metodología. Participaron 100 personas con lesión medular de más de seis meses de evolución de cuatro ciudades colombianas, así como ocho fisioterapeutas con una experiencia profesional promedio de 6,75 años. La validez de apariencia se evaluó a través de un grupo focal y una encuesta a los observadores, se calcularon los coeficientes de variación de los ítems y los índices de pertinencia y adecuación. Mediante el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman se analizó la validez concurrente con la escala de deficiencia AIS (American SpinalInjury Association[ASIA] Impairment Scale), y la escala de discapacidad WHO-DASII. Resultados. La pertinencia y adecuación global del instrumento arrojaron una media de 4,83/5 y 4,48/5 con un coeficiente de variación de 0,03. El índice de acuerdo entre observadores para las calificaciones de buena y excelente fue de 0,96 para pertinencia y 0,86 para adecuación. La discapacidad medida con el SCI-DAS mostró correlación significativa moderada con el nivel neurológico, los índice motor y sensitivo AIS, y alta con la discapacidad medida con el WHO-DAS II (p<0,001). Se encontró correlación baja estadísticamente marginal con la escala de compromiso funcional AIS (p=0,052). Conclusiones. Se encontró en general buena validez de apariencia del instrumento SCI-DAS, así mismo se evidenció la validez concurrente del instrumento SCI-DAS con la escala de deficiencia AIS y con la Escala de Discapacidad de la OMS-WHO-DAS II.

Consumer perceptions of trade show effectiveness : scale development and validation within a B2C context

Purpose This paper develops and estimates a model to measure consumer perceptions of trade show effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected at three separate B2C trade shows. Study 1 (n=47) involved field interviews with data subjected to qualitative item generation and content analysis. Study 2 data (n=147) were subjected to exploratory factor analysis and item-total correlation to identify a preliminary factor structure for the effectiveness construct and to test for reliability. In Study 3 (n=592), confirmatory factor analysis was undertaken to more rigorously test the factor structure and generalise across industries. Validity testing was also performed. Findings A three-dimensional factor structure for assessing consumer visitors’ perceptions of trade show effectiveness was produced incorporating research, operational, and entertainment components. Research limitations/implications Data were collected in Australia and results may not generalise across cultural boundaries. Practical implications The resulting measurement model may be used as a reliable post-hoc diagnostic tool to identify areas of trade show effectiveness where specific performance improvements are needed. Results indicate that exhibitors and organisers of B2C trade shows should consider effectiveness as a multidimensional phenomenon with entertainment, product / industry research, and the facilitation of purchase decision-making processes and problem resolution being key objectives for consumer attendees. These elements of effectiveness should each be addressed by exhibitors and organisers in planning their displays and events. Originality/value This is the first study to provide an empirically valid model for assessing trade show effectiveness from the consumer visitor’s perspective.

The individual and collective effect of U.S. colonialism in Puerto Rico : a scale construction and validation, with implications for social work education and practice.

Tesis (Doctor en Filosofía con Orientación en Trabajo Social y Políticas Comparadas de Bienestar Social) UANL, 2011.

B2B service brand identity: scale development and validation

Several brand identity frameworks have been published in the B2C and the B2B brand marketing literature. A reliable, valid and parsimonious service brand identity scale that empirically establishes the construct's dimensionality in a B2B market has yet to be developed. This paper reports the findings of a study conducted amongst 421 senior executives working in the UK IT Service sector to develop and validate a B2B Service Brand Identity Scale. Following established scale development procedures support is provided for a B2B Service Brand Identity Scale comprising five dimensions; employee and client focus, visual identity, brand personality, consistent communications and human resource initiatives. Concluding remarks discuss theoretical and managerial implications with limitations and directions for future research.

Consumers' need for uniqueness : scale development and validation

Consumers acquire and display material possessions for the purpose of feeling differentiated from other people and, thus, are targeted with a variety of marketing stimuli that attempt to enhance self‐perceptions of uniqueness. Because the pursuit of differentness (or counterconformity motivation) varies across individuals to influence consumer responses, we develop and validate a trait measure of consumers’ need for uniqueness. Consumers' need for uniqueness is defined as an individual’s pursuit of differentness relative to others that is achieved through the acquisition, utilization, and disposition of consumer goods for the purpose of developing and enhancing one’s personal and social identity. Following assessments of the scale’s latent structure, a series of validation studies examines the scale’s validity. The presentation of empirical work is followed by a discussion of how consumers' need for uniqueness could be used in better understanding consumer behavior and the role consumption plays in people’s expression of identity.