Drugs and the respiratory system

17.1 Drugs for bronchial asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 17.1.1 Introduction to asthma 17.1.2 Introduction to COPD 17.1.3 Drug delivery by inhalation 17.1.4 Drugs to treat 17.1.4.1 β2-adrenoceptor agonists 17.1.4.2 Muscarinic receptor antagonists 17.1.4.3 Leukotriene receptor antagonists 17.1.4.4 Theophylline 17.1.4.5 Oxygen for COPD 17.1.5 Drugs to prevent asthma 31.5.1 Glucocorticoids 31.5.2 Cromolyn sodium 17.1.6 Combination to treat and prevent asthma 17.1.7 Drug for allergic asthma – omalizumab 17.1.8 Emergency treatment of asthma 17.2. Expectorants, mucolytics, cough and oxygen 17.2.1 Introduction to expectorants and mucolytics 17.2.2 Expectorants 17.2.3 Mucolytics 17.2.4 Cough 17.2.5 Oxygen 17.3. Drugs for rhinitis and rhinorrea 17.3.1 Introduction 17.3.2 Histamine and H1-receptor antagonists 17.3.3 Sympathomimetic 17.3.4 Muscarinic receptor antagonists 17.3.4 Cromolyn sodium 17.3.5 Glucocorticoids

Psychotropic drugs

19.1 Depression and Antidepressants 19.1.1 Depression 19.1.2 Neurochemistry of Depression and the Monoamine Theory 19.1.3 Antidepressant Indications and Drug Classes 19.1.4 General Considerations with the use of Antidepressants 19.1.5 Tricyclic Antidepressants 19.1.6 Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors 19.1.7 Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors 19.1.8 Combined Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors 19.1.9 Long Term Adaptive Changes with Antidepressants 19.2 Psychosis, Schizophrenia, and Antipsychotics 19.2.1 Psychosis and Schizophrenia 19.2.2 Neurochemistry of Psychosis and the Dopamine Theory 19.2.3 Antipsychotic Drug Indications and Drug Classes 19.2.4 Antipsychotic Mechanisms of Action 19.2.5 Typical Antipsychotics (First Generation) 19.2.6 Atypical Antipsychotics (Second Generation) 19.3 Anxiety and Anxiolytics 19.3.1 Fear, Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders 19.3.2 Neurochemistry of Anxiety 19.3.3 Anxiolytic Drug Indications and Drug Classes 19.3.4 Benzodiazepines 19.3.5 Antidepressants 19.3.6 Buspirone

Neurological drugs and opioids for pain management

20.1 Epilepsy and an introduction to drugs used to treat 20.1.1 Introduction to epilepsy 20.1.2 Treatment of partial seizures 20.1.3 Treatment of generalised seizures 20.1.4 Treatment of status epilepticus 20.2 Neurodegenerative disorders; principles of treatment 20.2.1 Introduction to neurodegenerative disorders 20.2.2 Parkinson’s disease 20.2.2.1 Introduction to Parkinson’s disease 20.2.2.2 Dopaminergic system 20.2.2.3 Treatment to enhance the dopaminergic system 20.2.2.4 Treatment to inhibit the cholinergic system 20.2.3 Dementia/Alzheimer’s disease 20.2.3.1 Introduction to Alzheimer’s disease 20.2.3.2 Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease 20.2.4 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 43.4.1 Introduction 43.4.2 Treatment 20.3. Pain and opioid analgesics 20.3.1 Introduction to pain and analgesia 20.3.2 Introduction to opioids 20.3.3 Tolerance and physical dependence 20.3.4 Effects of opioids 20.3.5 Agonists at opioid μ receptors 20.3.6 Toxicity to opioids This section deals with the neurologic drugs. The neurologic drugs are used to treat epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. The opioids for pain management are also discussed in this section.

An introduction to anticancer drugs

An introduction to anticancer drugs 24.1 Introduction 24.2 The rationale behind anticancer drug therapy 24.3 Drugs used in cancer 24.3.1 Alkylating agents 24.3.2 Cytotoxic antibiotics 24.3.3 Antimetabolites 24.3.4 Microtubule inhibitors 24.3.5 Monoclonal antibodies 24.3.6 Steroid hormones and their antagonists 24.3.7 Other treatments

Drugs affecting blood

25. Drugs affecting blood 25.1 Introduction 25.2 Important dysfunctions of the blood system 25.3 Drugs used in to correct dysfunctions of the blood 25.3.1 Anti-thrombosis treatments 25.3.1.1 Platelet aggregation inhibitors 25.3.1.2 Anticoagulants 25.3.1.3 Thrombolytics 25.3.2 Treatments for anaemia 25.3.3 Treatments for bleeding disorders

Drugs for migraine

26.1 Migraine 26.2 Pathogenesis of Migraine 26.3 Cortical Spreading Depression 26.4 Neurogenic Inflammation Theory 26.5 Role of 5-HT in Migraine 26.6 Acute and Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine

Drugs in pregnancy and labour

27. Drugs in pregnancy and labour 27.1 Introduction 27.2 Common complaints in pregnancy and labour and their treatments 27.2.1 Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. 27.2.2 Suppression of early labour 27.2.3 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome 27.2.4 Postpartum haemorrhage 27.2.5 Prolactin excess 27.2.6 Nausea

Safety impacts of alcohol and other drugs in construction : development of an industry policy and cultural change management program

There is increasing concern about the impact of employees‟ alcohol and other drug (AOD) consumption on workplace safety and performance, particularly within the construction industry. While most Australian jurisdictions have identified this as a critical safety issue, information is limited regarding the prevalence of AODs in the workplace and there is limited evidential guidance regarding how to effectively and efficiently address such an issue. The current research aims to scientifically evaluate the use of AODs within the Australian construction industry in order to reduce the potential resulting safety and performance impacts and engender a cultural change in the workforce - to render it unacceptable to arrive at a construction workplace with impaired judgement from AODs. The study will adopt qualitative and quantitative methods to firstly evaluate the extent of general AOD use in the industry. Secondly, the development of an appropriate industry policy will adopt a non-punitive and rehabilitative approach developed in consultation with employers and employees across the infrastructure and building sectors, with the aim it be adopted nationally for adoption at the construction workplace. Finally, an industry specific cultural change management program and implementation plan will be developed through a nationally collaborative approach. Final results indicate that a proportion of those sampled in the construction sector may be at risk of hazardous alcohol consumption. A total of 286 respondents (58%) scored above the cut-off cumulative score for risky or hazardous alcohol. Other drug use was also identified as a major issue. Results support the need for evidence-based, preventative educational initiatives that are tailored to the industry. This paper will discuss the final survey and interview results.

Drugs, labels and (p)ill-fitting boxes : ADHD and children who are hard to teach

In offering a critical review of the problem we call “ADHD” this paper progresses in three stages. The first two parts juxtapose the dominant voices emanating from the literature in medicine and psychology, highlighting some interdependency between these otherwise competing interest groups. In part three, the nature of the relationship between these groups and the institution of the school is considered, as is the role that the school may play in the psycho-pathologisation of fidgety, distractible, active children who prove hard to teach. In so doing, the author provides an insight as to why the problem we call “ADHD” has achieved celebrity status in Australia and what the effects of that may be for children who come to be described in these ways.

Alcohol and other drugs in the Australian construction industry : a pathway for safety focused cultural change

Background: Anecdotal evidence from the infrastructure and building sectors highlights issues of alcohol and other drugs (AODs) and its association with safety risk on construction sites. Currently, there is no clear evidence on the prevalence and risk of AOD use among Australian construction workers and there is limited evidential guidance regarding how to effectively address such an issue. Aims: The current research aims to scientifically evaluate the use of AODs within the Australian construction industry in order to reduce the potential resulting safety and performance impacts and engender a cultural change in the workforce. A nationally consistent and collaborative approach across the workforce will be adopted. Methods: A national assessment of the use of AODs was conducted in participating organisations across three states. The World Health Organisation’s Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was used to measure alcohol use. Illicit drug use, ‘readiness to change’, impediments to reducing impairment, feasibility of proposed interventions, and employee attitudes and knowledge regarding AOD was also measured through a combination of survey items and interviews. Through an educative approach and consultation with employers, employees, union groups and leaders in applied AOD research, this assessment was used to inform and support cultural change management of AOD use in the industry. Results: Results (n=494) indicate that as in the general population, a proportion of those sampled in the construction sector may be at risk of hazardous alcohol consumption. A total of 286 respondents (58%) scored above the cut-off cumulative score for risky or hazardous alcohol use. Other drug use was also identified as a major issue. Interview responses and input from all project partners is presented within a guiding principle framework for cultural change. Conclusions: Results support the need for evidence-based, comprehensive and tailored responses in the workplace. This paper will discuss the final results in the context of facilitating cultural change in the construction industry.

Reducing the Risk of Alcohol and Other Drugs in Construction : An Australian Assessment

There is increasing concern about the impact of employees’ alcohol and other drug (AOD) consumption on workplace safety, particularly within the construction industry. No known study has scientifically evaluated the relationship between the use of drugs and alcohol and safety impacts in construction, and there has been only limited adoption of nationally coordinated strategies, supported by employers and employees to render it socially unacceptable to arrive at a construction workplace with impaired judgment from AODs. This research aims to scientifically evaluate the use of AODs within the Australian construction industry in order to reduce the potential resulting safety and performance impacts and engender a cultural change in the workforce. Using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), the study will adopt both quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate the extent of general AOD use in the industry. Results indicate that a proportion of the construction sector may be at risk of hazardous alcohol consumption. A total of 286 respondents (58%) scored above the cut-off score for risky alcohol use with 43 respondents (15%) scoring in the significantly ‘at risk’ category. Other drug use was also identified as a major issue that must be addressed. Results support the need for evidence-based, preventative educational initiatives that are tailored specifically to the construction industry.

An analysis of Australia's legal regime for imposing liability on manufacturers of pharmaceutical drugs

Following a trial in June 2009 where the Federal Court heard submissions regarding whether Merck Sharpe and Dohme Australia should be held liable for an increased risk of cardiovascular conditions noted in patients who had taken the anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx, a judgment was handed down against MSDA in March 2010. MSDA appealed to the Full Federal Court, where they were successful. Special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia was rejected in May 2012. This article will examine the themes raised in the trial judgment and the appropriateness of Australia’s statutory consumer protection regime through the lens of pharmaceutical drug injuries and side effects.

Results of the Queensland 2007-2012 roadside drug testing program : the prevalence of three illicit drugs

The purpose of this investigation is to present an overview of roadside drug driving enforcement and detections in Queensland, Australia since the introduction of oral fluid screening. Drug driving is a problematic issue for road safety and investigations of the prevalence and impact of drug driving suggest that, in particular, the use of illicit drugs may increase a driver’s involvement in a road crash when compared to a driver who is drug free. In response to the potential increased crash involvement of drug impaired drivers, Australian police agencies have adopted the use of oral fluid analysis to detect the presence of illicit drugs in drivers. This paper describes the results of roadside drug testing for over 80,000 drivers in Queensland, Australia, from December 2007 to June 2012. It provides unique data on the prevalence of methamphetamine, cannabis and ecstasy in the screened population for the period. When prevalence rates are examined over time, drug driving detection rates have almost doubled from around 2.0% at the introduction of roadside testing operations to just under 4.0% in the latter years. The most common drug type detected was methamphetamine (40.8%) followed by cannabis (29.8%) and methamphetamine/cannabis combination (22.5%). By comparison, the rate of ecstasy detection was very low (1.7%). The data revealed a number of regional, age and gender patterns and variations of drug driving across the state. Younger drivers were more likely to test positive for cannabis whilst older drivers were more likely to test positive for methamphetamine. The overall characteristics of drivers who tested positive to the presence of at least one of the target illicit drugs are they are likely to be male, aged 30-39 years, be driving a car on Friday, Saturday or Sunday between 6:00PM and 6:00AM and to test positive for methamphetamine.