The application of the statutory derivative action in Pt 2F.1A of the Corporations Act to companies in liquidation under Ch 5 : Well oiled machine or is Pt 2F.1A in need of a tune up?

The statutory derivative action was introduced in Australia in 2000. This right of action has been debated in the literature and introduced in a number of other jurisdictions as well. However, it is by no means clear that all issues have been resolved despite its operation in Australia for over 10 years. This article considers the application of Pt 2F.1A of the Corporations Act to companies in liquidation under Ch 5. It demonstrates that the application involves consideration of not only proper statutory interpretation but also policy matters around the role and the supervision by the court of a liquidator once a company has entered liquidation.

Costs order against company in liquidation unlikely to be effective indemnity

In Kimtran v Downie [2003] QCA 424, the Queensland Court of Appeal allowed an appeal from the decision of a District Court judge who had ordered costs against a non-party liquidator. It held that the court's decision in relation to the awarding of costs against a liquidator was not constrained by the decision of the of the Court of Appeal in Mahaffey v Belar Pty Ltd [1999] QCA 2 in the manner stated in the District Court.

Arrêt du conseil d'Etat du roi concernant la liquidation des offices supprimés

[Acte. 1716-07-07. Paris]

Arrêt du conseil d'Etat qui nomme des commissaires pour la liquidation des offices de contrôleurs des greffiers-garde-minutes des chancelleries près les cours, conseils supérieurs et provinciaux et Sièges présidiaux, supprimés par Edit de janvier 1717

[Acte. 1717-02-13. Paris]

Arrêt du conseil d'Etat qui nomme des commissaires pour procéder au jugement des oppositions formées au sceau des provisions des offices reçus en paiement des taxes des gens d'affaires ; à la liquidation des dettes privilégiées et à l'ordre des créanciers

[Acte. 1717-07-03. Paris]