The Effects of Cilostazol on Exercise-induced Ischaemia-reperfusion Injury in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Objectives: Cilostazol improves walking distance in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients. The study objectives were to assess the effects of cilostazol on walking distance, followed by the additional assessment of cilostazol on exercise-induced ischaemiaereperfusion injury in such patients.

Methods: PAD patients were prospectively recruited to a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomised to receive either cilostazol 100 mg or placebo twice a day. The primary end-point was an improvement in walking distance. Secondary end-points included the assessment of oxygen-derived free-radical generation, antioxidant consumption and other markers of the in?ammatory cascade. Initial and absolute claudication distances (ICDs and ACDs, respectively) were measured on a treadmill. In?ammatory response was assessed before and 30 min post-exercise by measuring lipid hydroperoxide, ascorbate, atocopherol, b-carotene, P-selectin, intracellular and vascular cell-adhesion molecules (I-CAM and V-CAM), thromboxane B2 (TXB2), interleukin-6, interleukin-10, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), albuminecreatinine ratio (ACR) and urinary levels of p75TNF receptor. All tests were performed at baseline and 6 and 24 weeks.

Results: One hundred and six PAD patients (of whom 73 were males) were recruited and successfully randomised from December 2004 to January 2006. Patients who received cilostazol demonstrated a more signi?cant improvement in the mean percentage change from baseline in ACD (77.2% vs. 26.6% at 6 weeks, pZ0.026 and 161.7% vs. 79.0% at 24 weeks, pZ0.048) as compared to the placebo. Cilostazol reduced lipid hydroperoxide levels compared to a placebo-related increase before and after exercise (6 weeks: pre-exercise: 11.8% vs.

AM1- receptor dependent protection by intermedin of human vascular and cardiac non-vascular cells from ischaemia-reperfusion injury

Intermedin (IMD) protects rodent heart and vasculature from oxidative stress and ischaemia. Less is known about distribution of IMD and its receptors and the potential for similar protection in man. Expression of IMD and receptor components were studied in human aortic endothelium cells (HAECs), smooth muscle cells (HASMCs), cardiac microvascular endothelium cells (HMVECs) and fibroblasts (v-HCFs). Receptor subtype involvement in protection by IMD against injury by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 1 mmol l?¹) and simulated ischaemia and reperfusion were investigated using receptor component-specific siRNAs. IMD and CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 were expressed in all cell types.When cells were treated with 1 nmol l?¹ IMD during exposure to 1 mmol l?¹ H2O2 for 4 h, viability was greater vs. H2O2 alone (P<0.05 for all cell types). Viabilities under 6 h simulated ischaemia differed (P<0.05) in the absence and presence of 1 nmol l?¹ IMD: HAECs 63% and 85%; HMVECs 51% and 68%; v-HCFs 42% and 96%. IMD 1 nmol l?¹ present throughout ischaemia (3 h) and reperfusion (1 h) attenuated injury (P<0.05): viabilities were 95%, 74% and 82% for HAECs, HMVECs and v-HCFs, respectively, relative to those in the absence of IMD (62%, 35%, 32%, respectively). When IMD 1 nmol l?¹ was present during reperfusion only, protection was still evident (P<0.05, 79%, 55%, 48%, respectively). Cytoskeletal disruption and protein carbonyl formation followed similar patterns. Pre-treatment (4 days) of HAECs with CRLR or RAMP2, but not RAMP1 or RAMP3, siRNAs abolished protection by IMD (1 nmol l?¹) against ischaemia-reperfusion injury. IMD protects human vascular and cardiac non-vascular cells from oxidative stress and ischaemia-reperfusion,predominantly via AM1 receptors.