Student focus and prioritization of design parameters in first-year engineering design projects

BACKGROUND Research on engineering design is a core area of concern within engineering education and a fundamental understanding of how engineering students approach and undertake design is necessary in order to develop effective design models and pedagogies. Understanding the factors related to design experiences in education and how they affect student practice can help educators as well as designers to leverage these factors as part of the design process. PURPOSE This study investigated the design practices of first-year engineering students’ and their experiences with a first-year engineering course design project. The research questions that guided the investigation were: 1. From a student perspective, what design parameters or criteria are most important? 2. How does this perspective impact subsequent student design practice throughout the design process? DESIGN/METHOD The authors employed qualitative multi-case study methods (Miles & Huberman, 1994) in order to the answer the research questions. Participant teams were observed and video recorded during team design meetings in which they researched the background for the design problem, brainstormed and sketched possible solutions, as well as built prototypes and final models of their design solutions as part of a course design project. Analysis focused on explanation building (Yin, 2009) and utilized within-case and cross-case analysis (Miles & Huberman, 1994). RESULTS We found that students focused disproportionally on the functional parameter, i.e. the physical implementation of their solution, and the possible/applicable parameter, i.e. a possible and applicable solution that benefited the user, in comparison to other given parameters such as safety and innovativeness. In addition, we found that individual teams focused on the functional and possible/ applicable parameters in early design phases such as brainstorming/ ideation and sketching. When prompted to discuss these non-salient parameters (from the student perspective) in the final design report, student design teams often used a post-hoc justification to support how the final designs fit the parameters that they did not initially consider. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests is that student design teams become fixated on (and consequently prioritize) certain parameters they interpret as important because they feel these parameters were described more explicitly in terms how they were met and assessed. Students fail to consider other parameters, perceived to be less directly assessable, unless prompted to do so. Failure to consider other parameters in the early design phases subsequently affects their approach in design phases as well. Case studies examining students’ study strategies within three Australian Universities illustrate similarities with some student approaches to design.

Design parameters for earth-wire power tapping

The paper deals with the calculation of the induced voltage on, and the equivalent capacitance of, an earth wire isolated for purposes of tapping small amounts of power from high-voltage lines. The influence of heights, diameters and spacings of conductors on these quantities have been studied and presented in the form of graphs.

The effects of operational and design parameters on the tolerance of ADSR fuel pin cladding to beam interruptions

This paper investigates the effects of design parameters, such as cladding and coolant material choices, and operational phenomena, such as creep and fission product decay heat, on the tolerance of Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactor (ADSR) fuel pin cladding to beam interruptions. This work aims to provide a greater understanding of the integration between accelerator and nuclear reactor technologies in ADSRs. The results show that an upper limit on cladding operating temperature of 550 °C is appropriate, as higher values of temperature tend to accelerate creep, leading to cladding failure much sooner than anticipated. The effect of fission product decay heat is to reduce significantly the maximum stress developed in the cladding during a beam-trip-induced transient. The potential impact of irradiation damage and the effects of the liquid metal coolant environment on the cladding are discussed. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effects of design parameters on sensitivity of microcantilever biosensors

Microcantilever biosensors produce cantilever bending due to differential surface stress between upper and lower surfaces of the cantilever. The bending is associated with concentration of ligands and adsorbed ligand-receptor intermolecular forces. Sample volume sizes in clinical diagnostic applications are usually very minute requiring a highly sensitive microcantilever for disease detection. This paper investigates a number of parameters that influence the sensitivity of microcantilever biosensors. The parameters include length, thickness, shape, and material of the cantilever beam. Biosensors of varying parameters are modeled and simulated. The results show that increasing the length of the cantilever beam enhances its sensitivity. However, increasing the thickness of the cantilever beam reduces its sensitivity. In static analysis, the shape of the cantilever beam does not notably impact upon its sensitivity. Also, using materials with lower Young’s modulus improves the sensitivity.