Two efficient representations for set-sharing analysis in logic programs

Set-Sharing analysis, the classic Jacobs and Langen's domain, has been widely used to infer several interesting properties of programs at compile-time such as occurs-check reduction, automatic parallelization, flnite-tree analysis, etc. However, performing abstract uniflcation over this domain implies the use of a closure operation which makes the number of sharing groups grow exponentially. Much attention has been given in the literature to mitígate this key inefficiency in this otherwise very useful domain. In this paper we present two novel alternative representations for the traditional set-sharing domain, tSH and tNSH. which compress efficiently the number of elements into fewer elements enabling more efficient abstract operations, including abstract uniflcation, without any loss of accuracy. Our experimental evaluation supports that both representations can reduce dramatically the number of sharing groups showing they can be more practical solutions towards scalable set-sharing.

Towards execution time estimation for logic programs via static analysis and profiling

Effective static analyses have been proposed which infer bounds on the number of resolutions or reductions. These have the advantage of being independent from the platform on which the programs are executed and have been shown to be useful in a number of applications, such as granularity control in parallel execution. On the other hand, in distributed computation scenarios where platforms with different capabilities come into play, it is necessary to express costs in metrics that include the characteristics of the platform. In particular, it is specially interesting to be able to infer upper and lower bounds on actual execution times. With this objective in mind, we propose an approach which combines compile-time analysis for cost bounds with a one-time profiling of the platform in order to determine the valúes of certain parameters for a given platform. These parameters calíbrate a cost model which, from then on, is able to compute statically time bound functions for procedures and to predict with a significant degree of accuracy the execution times of such procedures in the given platform. The approach has been implemented and integrated in the CiaoPP system.

A generic framework for the analysis and specialization of logic programs

The relationship between abstract interpretation and partial deduction has received considerable attention and (partial) integrations have been proposed starting from both the partial deduction and abstract interpretation perspectives. In this work we present what we argüe is the first fully described generic algorithm for efñcient and precise integration of abstract interpretation and partial deduction. Taking as starting point state-of-the-art algorithms for context-sensitive, polyvariant abstract interpretation and (abstract) partial deduction, we present an algorithm which combines the best of both worlds. Key ingredients include the accurate success propagation inherent to abstract interpretation and the powerful program transformations achievable by partial deduction. In our algorithm, the calis which appear in the analysis graph are not analyzed w.r.t. the original definition of the procedure but w.r.t. specialized definitions of these procedures. Such specialized definitions are obtained by applying both unfolding and abstract executability. Our framework is parametric w.r.t. different control strategies and abstract domains. Different combinations of such parameters correspond to existing algorithms for program analysis and specialization. Simultaneously, our approach opens the door to the efñcient computation of strictly more precise results than those achievable by each of the individual techniques. The algorithm is now one of the key components of the CiaoPP analysis and specialization system.

Some issues in analysis and specialization of modular ciao-prolog programs

Separating programs into modules is a well-known technique which has proven very useful in program development and maintenance. Starting by introducing a number of possible scenarios, in this paper we study different issues which appear when developing analysis and specialization techniques for modular logic programming. We discuss a number of design alternatives and their consequences for the different scenarios considered and describe where applicable the decisions made in the Ciao system analyzer and specializer. In our discussion we use the module system of Ciao Prolog. This is both for concreteness and because Ciao Prolog is a second-generation Prolog system which has been designed with global analysis and specialization in mind, and which has a strict module system. The aim of this work is not to provide a theoretical basis on modular analysis and specialization, but rather to discuss some interesting practical issues.

A system for automatically generating documentation for (C)LP programs

We describe lpdoc, a tool which generates documentation manuals automatically from one or more logic program source files, written in ISO-Prolog, Ciao, and other (C)LP languages. It is particularly useful for documenting library modules, for which it automatically generates a rich description of the module interface. However, it can also be used quite successfully to document full applications. A fundamental advantage of using lpdoc is that it helps maintaining a true correspondence between the program and its documentation, and also identifying precisely to what version of the program a given printed manual corresponds. The quality of the documentation generated can be greatly enhanced by including within the program text assertions (declarations with types, modes, etc.) for the predicates in the program, and machine-readable comments. One of the main novelties of lpdoc is that these assertions and comments are written using the Ciao system assertion language, which is also the language of communication between the compiler and the user and between the components of the compiler. This allows a significant synergy among specification, documentation, optimization, etc. A simple compatibility library allows conventional (C)LP systems to ignore these assertions and comments and treat normally programs documented in this way. The documentation can be generated in many formats including texinfo, dvi, ps, pdf, info, html/css, Unix nroff/man, Windows help, etc., and can include bibliographic citations and images. lpdoc can also generate “man” pages (Unix man page format), nicely formatted plain ascii “readme” files, installation scripts useful when the manuals are included in software distributions, brief descriptions in html/css or info formats suitable for inclusion in on-line indices of manuals, and even complete WWW and info sites containing on-line catalogs of documents and software distributions. The lpdoc manual, all other Ciao system manuals, and parts of this paper are generated by lpdoc.

An assertion language for debugging of constraint logic programs

Abstract is not available.

Estrategias Avanzadas de Tabulación y Paralelismo en Programas Lógicos = Advanced Evaluation Strategies for Tabling and Parallelism in Logic Programs

Dentro de los paradigmas de programación en el mundo de la informática tenemos la "Programación Lógica'', cuyo principal exponente es el lenguaje Prolog. Los programas Prolog se componen de un conjunto de predicados, cada uno de ellos definido en base a reglas que aportan un elevado nivel de abstracción y declaratividad al programador. Sin embargo, las formulación con reglas implica, frecuentemente, que un predicado se recompute varias veces para la misma consulta y además, Prolog utiliza un orden fijo para evaluar reglas y objetivos (evaluación SLD) que puede entrar en "bucles infinitos'' cuando ejecuta reglas recursivas declarativamente correctas. Estas limitaciones son atacadas de raiz por la tabulación, que se basa en "recordar'' en una tabla las llamadas realizadas y sus soluciones. Así, en caso de repetir una llamada tendríamos ya disponibles sus soluciones y evitamos la recomputación. También evita "bucles infinitos'' ya que las llamadas que los generan son suspendidas, quedando a la espera de que se computen soluciones para las mismas. La implementación de la tabulación no es sencilla. En particular, necesita de tres operaciones que no pueden ser ejecutadas en tiempo constante simultáneamente. Dichas operaciones son: suspensión de llamadas, relanzamiento de llamadas y {acceso a variables. La primera parte de la tesis compara tres implementaciones de tabulación sobre Ciao, cada una de las cuales penaliza una de estas operaciones. Por tanto, cada solución tiene sus ventajas y sus inconvenientes y se comportan mejor o peor dependiendo del programa ejecutado. La segunda parte de la tesis mejora la funcionalidad de la tabulación para combinarla con restricciones y también para evitar computaciones innecesarias. La programación con restricciones permite la resolución de ecuaciones como medio de programar, mecanismo altamente declarativo. Hemos desarrollado un framework para combinar la tabulación con las restricciones, priorizando objetivos como la flexibilidad, la eficiencia y la generalidad de nuestra solución, obteniendo una sinergia entre ambas técnicas que puede ser aplicada en numerosas aplicaciones. Por otra parte, un aspecto fundamental de la tabulación hace referencia al momento en que se retornan las soluciones de una llamada tabulada. Local evaluation devuelve soluciones cuando todas las soluciones de la llamada tabulada han sido computadas. Por contra, batched evaluation devuelve las soluciones una a una conforme van siendo computadas, por lo que se adapta mejor a problemas donde no nos interesa encontrar todas las soluciones. Sin embargo, su consumo de memoria es exponencialmente peor que el de local evaluation. La tesis presenta swapping evaluation, que devuelve soluciones tan pronto como son computadas pero con un consumo de memoria similar a la de local evaluation. Además, se implementan operadores de poda, once/1, para descartar la búsqueda de soluciones alternativas cuando encontramos la solución deseada. Por último, Prolog adopta con relativa facilidad soluciones para paralelismo gracias a su flexibilidad en el control de la ejecución y a que sus asignaciones son lógicas. La tercera parte de la tesis extiende el paralelismo conjuntivo de Ciao para trabajar con programas no deterministas, lo que presenta dos problemas principales: los objetivos atrapados y la recomputación de objetivos. Las soluciones clásicas para los objetivos atrapados rompían muchos invariantes de la ejecución Prolog, siendo soluciones difíciles de mantener y de extender, que la experiencia nos dice que han caído en desuso. Nosotros proponemos una solución modular (basada en la implementación de swapping evaluation), localizada y que no rompe los invariantes de la ejecución Prolog, pero que mantiene un alto rendimiento de la ejecución paralela. En referencia a la recomputación de objetivos paralelos en presencia de no determinismo hemos adaptado ténicas derivadas de la tabulación para memorizar computaciones de estos objetivos y evitar su recomputación.

Implementation of an event driven scheme for visualizing parallel execution of logic programs

This article presents in an informal way some early results on the design of a series of paradigms for visualization of the parallel execution of logic programs. The results presented here refer to the visualization of or-parallelism, as in MUSE and Aurora, deterministic dependent and-parallelism, as in Andorra-I, and independent and-parallelism as in &-Prolog. A tool has been implemented for this purpose and has been interfaced with these systems. Results are presented showing the visualization of executions from these systems and the usefulness of the resulting tool is briefly discussed.