Illinois health messenger.

None published: 1954-1955.

Illinois health news : Illinois State Board of Health official monthly bulletin.

Title from cover.

What does a county health department mean to you?

Cover title.

Report of the Board of Health of the City of Chicago for ...

Vol. for 1867, 1868, and 1869 includes: Sanitary history of Chicago from 1833 to 1870.

Annual report of the State Board of Health of New York.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report of the Commissioner of Health of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

"In compliance with requirements of Section 13 of the act "Creating a Department of Health ...," approved the 27th day of April, A.D. 1905, I have the honor to transmit my First Annual Report as Commissioner of Health, covering the period beginning with the date of my appointment, June 6, 1905, and ending Dec. 31, 1906." pg. 1, 1st Annual Report.

Public hygiene in America : being the centennial discourse delivered before the International Medical Congress, Philadelphia, September, 1876 /

Includes index.

Annual report of the State Board of Health and Vital Statistics of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Some reports issued in two parts.

Annual report of the Secretary of the State Board of Health of the State of Michigan, for the fiscal year ending...

Description based on first issue; title from title page.

Health services reports

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report of the State Board of Health of South Carolina.

Title varies slightly.

A qualitative analysis of health care provider perceptions of depression and suicidality in Mozambique

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Asylee Access to Refugee Health Screenings: Refugee Health Screenings Should Be Urgently Granted to Asylees in Washington State

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Review of Health Impact Assessments in the Criminal Justice System, 2001-2016

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Public and private psychiatry: Can they work together and is it worth the effort?

Objective: Partnerships in mental health care, particularly between public and private psychiatric services, are being increasingly recognized as important for optimizing patient management and the efficient organization of services. However, public sector mental health services and private psychiatrists do not always work well together and there seem to be a number of barriers to effective collaboration. This study set out to investigate the extent of collaborative 'shared care' arrangements between a public mental health service and private psychiatrists practising nearby. It also examined possible barriers to collaboration and some possible solutions to the identified problems. Method: A questionnaire examining the above factors was sent to all public sector mental health clinicians and all private psychiatrists in the area. Results: One hundred and five of the 154 (68.2%) public sector clinicians and 103 of the 194 (53.1%) private psychiatrists returned surveys. The main barriers to successful collaboration identified by members of both sectors were: 'Difficulty communicating' endorsed by 71.4% of public clinicians and 72% of private psychiatrists, 'Confusion of roles and responsibilities' endorsed by 62.9% and 66%, respectively, and 'Different treatment approach' by 47.6% and 45.6%, respectively. Over 60% of private psychiatrists identified problems with access to the public system as a barrier to successful shared care arrangements. It also emerged, as hypothesized, that the public and private systems tend to manage different patient populations and that public clinicians in particular are not fully aware of the private psychiatrists' range of expertise. This would result in fewer referrals for shared care across the sectors. Conclusions: A number of barriers to public sector clinicians and private psychiatrists collaborating in shared care arrangements were identified. The two groups surveyed identified similar barriers. Some of these can potentially be addressed by changes to service systems. Others require cultural shifts in both sectors. Improved communications including more opportunities for formal and informal meetings between people working in the two sectors would be likely to improve the understanding of the complementary sector's perspective and practice. Further changes would be expected to require careful work between the sectors on training, employment and practice protocols and initiatives, to allow better use of the existing services and resources.