Advocacy in pain management: the role of the anaesthetic nurse specialist

Peri-operative nursing practice is constantly changing and demanding specialist knowledge, skills and expertise to embrace these changes. All patients in need of anaesthesia are entitled to the same high quality peri-operative care and therefore those assisting the anaesthetist must be competent and effective practitioners. With this in mind the authors shall give a reflective account highlighting the role of Anaesthetic Nurse Specialist (ANS) in promoting leadership within the peri-operative environment and how it can be nurtured and facilitated to achieve professional autonomy and promote patient advocacy.

Perceptions of the Nurse Practitioner Role in Facilitating the Implementation of an Onsite Pain Management Team in Long Term Care

Background: One strategy to improve pain management in long term care (LTC) is to optimize the emerging role of the nurse practitioner (NP) in LTC. The purpose of this sub study was to learn about the NP role in implementing an onsite, interdisciplinary Pain Team in the LTC home setting.

Methods: We used a case study design that included two NPs who worked at separate LTC homes. Each of the NPs completed a weekly questionnaire of pain-related activities that they engaged in over a one-year implementation period; and a diary, using critical reflection, about their experiences and strategies used to implement the Pain Team. Descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis were used to analyze the case study data.

Findings: NPs tended to be most engaged in pain assessment and collaborated more with licensed nurses and personal support workers; less with pharmacists. NPs were more involved in organizational level activities, such as participating in committee work or assisting with the development of policies and procedures about pain. NPs created palliative care and pain service protocols; engaged in policy development, in-servicing, quality assurance and advocacy; and encouraged best practices. NPs were challenged with time constraints for pain management and balancing other role priorities and felt that increased scope of practice for them was needed.

Conclusions: The results of this study highlight how NPs implemented a Pain Team in LTC which may be helpful to others interested in implementing a similar strategy to reduce residents’ pain.

Acute pain management: Implications of scientific evidence for nursing practice in the postoperative context

Unrelieved acute pain remains prevalent in hospitalized patients despite advances in pain management. A decade after the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council called for improved pain management practices by health professionals, it released clinical guidelines to provide clinicians with current scientific evidence to augment their clinical decision-making. This paper examines the implications of national guidelines on nursing practice and highlights the inadequacies of current implementation policies. Pain management guidelines have failed to decrease patients' postoperative pain because organizations and researchers have ignored the impact of contextual influences on clinicians' decision-making. It is recommended that for successful implementation of national guidelines to occur at the local level of practice, organizations must assist clinicians to identify local influences on their decision-making, to address the issues specific to their own work environment and to evaluate any changes in practice.

Effectiveness of pain management in hospital in the home programs

Alternative health care delivery models such as HITH facilitate the care of patients requiring acute treatments in their own homes. There are over 570 Diagnostic Related Groups managed in HITH programs and many of these are known to have associated physical pain. The impact of the home environment on patients’ experience of pain or how pain is managed is poorly understood. The purpose of this presentation is to
present the background and preliminary findings of a study that aims to increase our understanding of the issues related to providing optimal pain management for acute care patients who are transferred to Hospital in the Home. This knowledge will enable the development of effective practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes. More specifically, the aims are:
• To identify whether patients are transferred to HITH in pain or develop
   significant pain while in the program
• To identify the frequency and intensity of pain experienced by patients in 3      HITH programs.
• To describe patients’ experience of pain in the home environment.
• To investigate whether patients receive adequate pain relief once                      transferred to HITH.
• To explore the strategies patients use to manage pain at home.

The study will be carried out over 12 months in three HITH units in Victoria: Box Hill Hospital, Alfred Hospital and Epworth Hospital. The design is a descriptive survey of patients’ experience of pain and pain management using a modified version of The American Pain Society’s Patient Outcome Questionnaire. 360 consecutive surgical patients transferred to HITH care in the three participating programs will be interviewed by telephone between 48 and 72 hours of admission to the program.

The findings of this study will identify issues in providing optimum pain management for patients receiving acute care in non-traditional treatment environments.

Knowledge transfer and utilization: implications for home healthcare pain management

Implementation of research evidence into clinical practice is a complex and dynamic process that has become the subject of investigation in the field of "translation science" or "knowledge utilization." Research shows how individuals, units, and organizations all influence the rate and extent of adoption of research evidence. Environmental factors also play an important role in this process. This article summarizes key lessons from translation science and examines the implications for the organization and delivery of home healthcare. The implementation of pain management guidelines is used as an example.

Pain beliefs and pain management of oncology patients

Cancer pain is estimated to occur in 30% to 70% of patients with early-stage cancer and 60% to 95% with advanced cancer. Current research shows that cancer pain continues to be undertreated despite the availability of analgesics and established guidelines to maximize their effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to describe oncology patients' pain experience during an episode of hospitalization with particular emphasis on exploring the relationship between oncology patients' beliefs about pain and the treatment they received. Consecutive patients (n = 126) were interviewed 48 hours after admission to an urban and a regional hospital in Australia; 47.6% of patients had experienced moderate to severe pain in the previous 24 hours but had only received 40.4% of available analgesic. Patients held varying beliefs about pain and pain treatments in particular, 41% held strong beliefs about the potential for addiction to narcotics. Patients who held this belief reported higher current pain, worst pain intensity, and higher average pain intensity in the previous 24 hours. Effective pain management in the inpatient oncology setting continues to be an important clinical issue, and patients do not receive all available pain treatment. There may be an important association between patients' beliefs about pain and pain management and the pain management they receive.