Rituximab for chronic fatigue syndrome?

Most people complain about being tired and wish they could sleep in for a few more hours instead of going to work. However, 'being tired' has a whole different meaning for people living with chronic fatigue syndrome, which is also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis.

Resistance Mechanisms of Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas against Rituximab Treatment

Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against B-cell specific CD20 antigen, is used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) and chronic lymphatic leukemia. In combination with chemotherapeutics rituximab has remarkably improved the outcome of NHL patients, but a vast variation in the lengths of remissions remains and the outcome of individual patients is difficult to predict. This thesis has searched for an explanation for this by studying the effector mechanisms of rituximab and by comparing gene expression in lymphoma tissue samples of patients with long- and short-term survival. This work demonstrated that activation of complement (C) system is in vitro more efficient effector mechanism of rituximab than cellular mechanisms or apoptosis. Activation of the C system was also shown in vivo during rituximab treatment. However, intravenously administered rituximab could not enter the cerebrospinal fluid, and neither C activation nor removal of lymphoma cells was observed in central nervous system. In vitro cytotoxicity assays showed that rituximab-induced cell killing could be markedly improved with simultaneous neutralization of the C regulatory proteins CD46 (Membrane cofactor protein), CD55 (Decay-accelerating factor), and CD59 (protectin). In a retrospective study of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, low lymphoma tissue mRNA expressions of CD59 and CD55 were associated with a good prognosis and in a progressive flow cytometry study high expression of CD20 relative to CD55 was correlated to a longer progression free survival. Gene expression profile analysis revealed that expression of certain often cell cycle, signal transduction or immune response related genes correlate with clinical outcome of FL patients. Emphasizing the role of tumor microenvironment the best differentiating genes Smad1 and EphA1 were demonstrated to be mainly expressed in the non-malignant cells of tumors. In conclusion, this thesis shows that activation of the C system is a clinically important effector mechanism of rituximab and that microenvironment factor in tumors and expression of C regulatory proteins affect markedly the efficacy of immunochemotherapy. This data can be used to identify more accurately the patients for whom immunochemotherapy is given. It may also be beneficial in development of rituximab-containing and other monoclonal antibody therapies against cancer.

Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab:an effective chemoimmunotherapy combination with high remission rates for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

BACKGROUND: Combined Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide is now standard first-line therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and the addition of Rituximab improves outcome.

METHODS: We adopted a modified Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) protocol in treating 39 patients (median age 57 years) with progressive or advanced CLL. Depending on CR, treatment was given for four or six cycles.

RESULT: Twenty-six patients were treatment naïve and 13 were pre-treated. Twelve patients had progressive Binet stage A, 16 stage B and 11 stage C disease. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100%, with 75% achieving CR. Neutropenia was the major toxicity in 71/187 (38%) of the cycles. There were five deaths, two from infection and three from progressive disease. Twenty-six of 31 patients have maintained their post-treatment disease status for a median of 17 months (2-41).

CONCLUSION: We conclude that FCR is a feasible, well-tolerated and effective treatment for patients with CLL.

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in first relapse for diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the rituximab era:an analysis based on data from the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation remains the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The impact of rituximab combined with chemotherapy in either first- or second-line therapy on the ultimate results of ASCT remains to be determined, however. This study was designed to evaluate the benefit of ASCT in patients achieving a second complete remission after salvage chemotherapy by retrospectively comparing the disease-free survival (DFS) after ASCT for each patient with the duration of the first complete remission (CR1). Between 1990 and 2005, a total of 470 patients who had undergone ASCT and reported to the European Blood and Bone Transplantation Registry with Medical Essential Data Form B information were evaluated. Of these 470 patients, 351 (74%) had not received rituximab before ASCT, and 119 (25%) had received rituximab before ASCT. The median duration of CR1 was 11 months. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 24 months. The BEAM protocol was the most frequently used conditioning regimen (67%). After ASCT, the 5-year overall survival was 63% (95% confidence interval, 58%-67%) and 5-year DFS was 48% (95% confidence interval, 43%-53%) for the entire patient population. Statistical analysis showed a significant increase in DFS after ASCT compared with duration of CR1 (median, 51 months versus 11 months; P < .001). This difference was also highly significant for patients with previous exposure to rituximab (median, 10 months versus not reached; P < .001) and for patients who had experienced relapse before 1 year (median, 6 months versus 47 months; P < .001). Our data indicate that ASCT can significantly increase DFS compared with the duration of CR1 in relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma and can alter the disease course even in patients with high-risk disease previously treated with rituximab.

Swiss consensus statement: Recommendations for optimising re-treatment with MabThera (rituximab) in rheumatoid arthritis.

Rituximab is an effective treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which has been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe disease in patients with an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies. Rituximab differs from other available biological agents for RA by way of its unique mode of action and unrivalled long dosing interval. The efficacy of rituximab subsides progressively over time and re-therapy is generally required to maintain long term disease control. The timing of re-treatment is currently not well established and varies widely in clinical practice. The present document is a concise recommendation regarding re-treatment with rituximab, based on validated outcomes such as the DAS28 and the EULAR response criteria. The recommendation was established through consensus between practitioners familiar with rituximab therapy in RA. Optimisation of the rituximab re-treatment schedule may improve patient outcomes and balance risks and benefits for the individual patient.

Targeting intratumoral B cells with rituximab in addition to CHOP in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. A clinicobiological study of the GELA.

Background In angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, symptoms linked to B-lymphocyte activation are common, and variable numbers of CD20(+) large B-blasts, often infected by Epstein-Barr virus, are found in tumor tissues. We postulated that the disruption of putative B-T interactions and/or depletion of the Epstein-Barr virus reservoir by an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) could improve the clinical outcome produced by conventional chemotherapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five newly diagnosed patients were treated, in a phase II study, with eight cycles of rituximab + chemotherapy (R-CHOP21). Tumor infiltration, B-blasts and Epstein-Barr virus status in tumor tissue and peripheral blood were fully characterized at diagnosis and were correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: A complete response rate of 44% (95% CI, 24% to 65%) was observed. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 22% to 61%) and overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI, 40% to 78%). The presence of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (14/21 patients) correlated with Epstein-Barr virus score in lymph nodes (P<0.004) and the detection of circulating tumor cells (P=0.0019). Despite peripheral Epstein-Barr virus clearance after treatment, the viral load at diagnosis (>100 copy/μg DNA) was associated with shorter progression-free survival (P=0.06). Conclusions We report here the results of the first clinical trial targeting both the neoplastic T cells and the microenvironment-associated CD20(+) B lymphocytes in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, showing no clear benefit of adding rituximab to conventional chemotherapy. A strong relationship, not previously described, between circulating Epstein-Barr virus and circulating tumor cells is highlighted.

Comparación farmacoeconómica (costo – utilidad / beneficio / efectividad) del Rituximab, con el tratamiento convencional para pacientes con Linfoma No Hodgkins

El Linfoma no Hodgkin es un cáncer maligno que tiene baja incidencia a nivel nacional pero altos costos en la atención catalogándose por su manejo como enfermedad de alto costo. El tratamiento de acuerdo a fase de tratamiento, clasificación histológica y respuesta a tratamiento se consideran las alternativas de tratamiento determinadas en guías clínicas en este trabajo se revisará el tratamiento con quimioterapia (CHOP) y el tratamiento con Rituximab + CHOP Objetivo: Evaluar comparativamente el tratamiento con quimioterapia y el Rituximab en cuanto a costo beneficio / utilidad /efectividad y el efecto de ambas terapias sobre la calidad de vida y carga de enfermedad, desde la perspectiva del marco normativo vigente y la aplicación del mismo en una EPS Resultados: en los análisis de costo beneficio, utilidad y efectividad, se evidenció que los costos del tratamiento del Rituximab superan los de quimioterapia, pero al comparar los resultados obtenidos mediante AVISA, y QALY, confirmaron los resultados evidenciados en literatura, siendo estas las variables más sensibles para determinación de protocolos de manejo de Linfoma No Hodgkin. Conclusiones: aunque el Rituximab es una buena opción terapéutica para el Linfoma No Hodgkin, los costos que se ocasionan por este medicamento sobrepasan la compensación recibida por estos usuarios, es necesario que las políticas públicas relacionen este tipo de análisis para adecuar los ingresos a los egresos y permitir el equilibrio económico de la atención, no permitir que por cuestiones de economía empresarial se tomen alternativas equivocas que pueden ir el menos cabo de la salud de los usuarios.

Should rituximab be considered as the first-choice treatment for severe autoimmune rheumatic diseases?

The present study aimed to assess the tolerance and efficacy of rituximab (RTX), a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 receptor present in B lymphocytes, in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD). For this purpose, patients treated with RTX and their respective clinical charts were comprehensively examined. Indications for treatment were a refractory character of the disease, inefficacy or intolerance of other immunosuppressors. Activity indexes (SLEDAI, DAS28, and specific clinical manifestations) were used to evaluate efficacy. Serious side effects were also recorded. Seventy-four patients were included. Forty-three patients had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 21 had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 8 had Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), and 2 had Takayasu’s arteritis (TA). RTX was well-tolerated in 66 (89%) patients. In 8 patients (SLE = 3, SS = 3, RA = 2), serious side effects lead to discontinuation. The mean follow-up period was 12 ± 7.8 (2–35) months. The efficacy of RTX was registered in 58/66 (87%) patients, of whom 36 (83%) had SLE, 18/21 (85%) had RA, 3/8 (37%) had SS, and 1 had TA. The mean time of efficacy was 6.3 ± 5.1 weeks. A significant steroid-sparing effect was noticed in half of the patients. These results add further evidence for the use of RTX in AIRD. Based on its risk–benefit ratio, RTX might be used as the first-choice treatment for patients with severe AIRD.

Eficácia, segurança e tolerabilidade do Rituximab para o tratamento da artrite reumatóide : metanálises

A artrite reumatoide é uma patologia de natureza autoimmune que apresenta diversas intervenções farmacológicas e não-farmacológicas para seu tratamento e controle, ncluindo o rituximabe. O objetivo deste trabalho consistiu em avaliar a eficácia, segurança e tolerabilidade do rituximabe no tratamento da artrite reumatoide. Foram realizadas uma revisão sistemática (até junho de 2011) e meta-análises incluindo estudos clínicos controlados randomizados que comparassem o rituximabe com o placebo, ambos com concomitante metotrexato. Somente estudos com qualidade média ou alta foram ncluídos. A eficácia foi avaliada baseando-se nas mudanças dos ACR20, 50 e 70; a segurança foi avaliada baseando-se nos eventos adversos sérios; a tolerabilidade foi avaliada pelos abandonos do tratamento devido a eventos adversos. Todos os parâmetros foram avaliados após 24 semanas de tratamento. Quatro estudos atingiram os critérios de inclusão, incluindo 1280 pacientes. O grupo do rituximabe apresentou maior eficácia para os parâmetros avaliados (ACR20, ACR50 e ACR70 – Risco Relativo (RR) de 2,24 [1,86; 2,71], 3,29 [2,31; 4,68] e 3,90 [1,88; 8,09], respectivamente). Para os eventos adversos sérios, não foi detectada diferença significativa entre os grupos (RR = 0,83 [0,54; 1,26]. Para os abandonos devido a eventos adversos, também não foi detectada diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos (RR = 1,49 [0,46; 4,84]. Em conclusão, o rituximabe apresentou maior eficácia, quando comparado ao placebo, sem diferenças significativas entre os grupos em termos de segurança e tolerabilidade.

Utilizzo del Rituximab nel trattamento della vasculiti ANCA associate.

Introduzione. Recenti studi hanno dimostrato che il Rituximab (RTX) è un’alternativa sicura ed efficace alla ciclofosfamide nell’indurre la remissione in pazienti con severa vasculite ANCA-associata (AAV) di nuova diagnosi o recidiva. Scopo dello studio era valutare l’efficacia e la sicurezza del RTX nei nostri pazienti con AAV. Metodi. Studio retrospettivo delle caratteristiche cliniche, dei risultati e della tolleranza al RTX dei pazienti con AAV trattati presso il nostro centro da Gennaio 2006 a Dicembre 2011. Inizialmente veniva utilizzato lo schema convenzionale delle 4 somministrazioni settimanali da 375 mg/m2. Dal 2011 sulla base dell’esperienza maturata e dei nuovi dati della letteratura si decideva di non adottare uno schema fisso per le recidive, ma di somministrare una o due dosi secondo la severità della recidiva ed il rischio infettivo. Risultati. Venivano trattati 51 pazienti con AAV, 15/51 (29%) di nuova diagnosi e 36/51 (71%) ad una recidiva. La maggior parte dei pazienti con nuova diagnosi presentavano una micropoliangioite con severo interessamento renale, 5/15 (33%) erano in dialisi dall’esordio. 32/36 (89%) pazienti trattati ad una recidiva presentavano una recidiva granulomatosa di Granulomatosi di Wegener (WG). Tutti ottenevano una remissione, più rapidamente per le manifestazioni vasculitiche. 2/5 pazienti in dialisi dall’esordio recuperavano la funzione renale. Si osservavano 11 recidive in 9 pazienti con GW mediamente dopo 23.1 mesi, tutti ottenevano nuovamente la remissione. Ad un follow-up medio di 20.1 mesi si registravano 4 decessi, 3 (3/15, 20%) nel gruppo di pazienti con nuova diagnosi, uno (1/36, 3%) nel gruppo trattato ad una recidiva. Quattro pazienti sospendevano il RTX per infezioni. Conclusioni. Nella nostra casistica il RTX si è dimostrato efficace e sicuro nell’indurre la remissione in pazienti con severa AAV, sia all’esordio che alla recidiva. I pazienti con WG presentano maggior rischio di recidiva e dovrebbero pertanto essere mantenuti in terapia immunosoppressiva dopo RTX.

Efficacy of rituximab and cladribine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and feasibility of stem cell mobilization: a prospective multicenter phase II trial (protocol SAKK 34/02)

This phase II trial investigated rituximab and cladribine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Four induction cycles, comprising cladribine (0.1 mg/kg/day days 1-5, cycles 1-4) and rituximab (375 mg/m(2) day 1, cycles 2-4), were given every 28 days. Stem cell mobilization (rituximab 375 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) day 2; and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 10 microg/kg/day, from day 4) was performed in responders. Of 42 patients, nine achieved complete remission (CR), 15 very good partial remission, and two nodular partial remission (overall response rate 62%). Stem cell mobilization and harvesting (> or = 2 x 10(6) stem cells/kg body weight) were successful in 12 of 20 patients. Rituximab infusion-related adverse events were moderate. The main grade 3/4 adverse events during induction were neutropenia and lymphocytopenia. Rituximab plus cladribine was effective; however, the CR rate was modest and stem cell harvest was impaired in a large number of responding patients.