1 resultado para 150102 Auditing and Accountability
em Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (38)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (16)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (88)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (15)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (2)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (64)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (435)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (17)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (52)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (36)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries. This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives.