Benchmarking the knowledge competitiveness of the globe's high performing regions:a review of the World Knowledge Competitiveness Index

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the way in which the knowledge competitiveness of regions is measured and further introduces the World Knowledge Competitiveness Index (WKCI) benchmarking tool. Design/methodology/approach – The methodology consists of an econometric analysis of key indicators relating to the concept of knowledge competitiveness for 125 regions from across the globe consisting of 55 representatives from North America, 45 from Europe and 25 from Asia and Oceania. Findings – The key to winning the super competitive race in the knowledge-based economy is investment in the future: research and development, and education and training. It is found that the majority of the high-performing regional economies in the USA have a knowledge competitive edge over their counterparts in Europe and Asia. Research limitations/implications – To an extent, the research is limited by the availability of comparable indicators and metrics at the regional level that extend across the globe. Whilst comparative data are often accessible at the national level, regional data sources remain underdeveloped. Practical implications – The WKCI has become internationally recognized as an important instrument for economic development policymakers and regional investment promotion agents as they create and refine their strategies and targets. In particular, it has provided a benchmark that allows regions to compare their knowledge competitiveness with other regions for around the world and not only their own nation or continent. Originality/value – The WKCI is the first composite and relative measure of the knowledge competitiveness of the globe's best performing regions.

Le groupe du Fer de Lance mélanésien face à ses défis

Cet article examine la complexité du processus d’intégration régionale en Océanie à travers le cas du groupe du Fer de Lance mélanésien (gflm). L’émergence de cette structure subrégionale en 1988 avait pour but d’affirmer la spécificité mélanésienne au cœur du Pacifique Sud. Or, en vingt-cinq années d’existence, le Fer de Lance ne semble pas avoir pleinement réalisé tous les objectifs qu’il s’était initialement fixés. Ses ambitions, politiques en particulier, ne sont qu’en partie réalisées. Quant à la récente présidence fidjienne du Fer de Lance, elle a tenté de donner une nouvelle stature régionale au groupe, mais y est-elle parvenue ? Cet article analyse les défis politiques, intérieurs et extérieurs, que le gflm rencontre depuis sa création et considère ceux qui lui restent à relever. This paper examines the complexities of regional integration in Oceania through the case study of the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG). The emergence of a new subregional structure in 1988 aimed to support the development of the Melanesian identity within the South Pacific. However, after twenty-five years of existence, the Spearhead Group does not seem to have reached all its initial objectives. Its political ambition has only partly been achieved. The recent Fijian leadership of the MSG has attempted to give a new regional dimension to the Melanesian group, but has it succeeded? This paper analyses how the subregional group has faced the challenges that emerged from its regional environment as well as from within its own structure. It fnally considers the new challenges ahead for the Melanesian group.

Horizons régionaux et variations océaniennes des territoires français

« L’identité régionale […] repose sur une réalité concrète : la mer est aussi réelle que vous et moi […]. Je ne fais que constater qu’elle forge le caractère de cette planète, qu’elle est une source majeure de notre subsistance et que nous l’avons tous en partage, où que nous soyons en Océanie. Mais au-delà des épreuves quotidiennes, la mer nous lie les uns aux autres. Elle est source de sagesse infinie. La mer est notre métaphore la plus puissante. L’océan est en nous. » (Hau’Ofa, 2015 [1997] : 55-56). Souvent présentés de manière séparée, les territoires français dans le Pacifique Sud, objets de ce dossier, possèdent cependant des horizons régionaux intéressants qui mettent en exergue la variété des écosystèmes politiques de l’espace océanien1. Les facettes multidimensionnelles des évolutions humaines montrent une « mer d’îles » océaniennes en mouvement, selon l’intellectuel tongien Epeli Hau’Ofa (2008 [1993]). Sa pensée alimente la formation d’une identité régionale océanienne, à p... « Regional identity […] has been constructed on a foundation of concrete reality. That the sea is as real as you and I […], that it shapes the character of this planet, that it is a major source of our sustenance, that it is something that we all share in common wherever we are in Oceania – all of these are statements of fact. Yet beyond that level of everyday experience, the sea is our pathway to each other and to everyone else, the sea is our endless saga, the sea is our most powerful metaphor, the ocean is in us. » (Hau’Ofa, 2015 [1997]: 55-56). Often conceived of as separate entities, French overseas territories in the South Pacific, as the subject of this special issue, nevertheless possess interesting regional horizons, which highlight the variety of political ecosystems of Oceania. The multidimensional facets of human evolution show an Oceanian “Sea of Islands” in constant movement, according to the Tongan intellectual Epeli Hau’Ofa (2008 [1993]). His philosophy contributes to...