Respiratory syncytial virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a major cause of respiratory tract infections in immunocompromised patients such as children less than 2 years, premature infants with congenital heart disease and chronic lung disease, elderly patients and patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). HSCT patients are at high risk of RSV infection, at increased risk of developing pneumonia, and RSV-related mortality. Immunodeficiency can be a major risk factor for severe infection & mortality. Therapy of RSV infection with Ribavirin, Palivizumab and Immunoglobulin has shown to reduce the risk of progression to LRI and mortality, especially if initiated early in the disease. Data on RSV infection in HSCT patients is limited, especially at various levels of immunodeficiency. 323 RSV infections in HSCT patients have been identified between 1/1995 and 8/2009 at University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). In this proposed study, we attempted to analyze a de-identified database of these cases and describe the epidemiologic characteristics of RSV infection in HSCT patients, the course of the infection, rate of development of pneumonia and RSV-related mortality in HSCT patients at UTMDACC.^ Key words: RSV infections, HSCT patients ^

Seasonality of respiratory syncytial virus infection in Texas

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of respiratory infection in infants and children that can result in bronchiolitis or pneumonia. Each year in the United States, it causes up to 400 deaths and 125,000 hospitalizations among children less than one year of age. RSV is transmitted by direct or close contact with contaminated secretions, which may involve droplets and fomites. Monthly administration of a monoclonal RSV antibody, palivizumab (Synagis™, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD), in premature infants, infants with chronic lung disease, or congenital heart disease has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of severe RSV infection. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) is a laboratory based passive reporting system that collects state, regional, and national RSV data. The CDC defines the RSV season onset as “the first of 2 consecutive weeks during which the mean percentage of specimens testing positive for RSV antigen is 10%.” RSV season offset is defined as the last of 2 consecutive weeks during which the percentage of positive specimens is less than or equal to 10%. Annual RSV epidemics generally occur during the winter and early spring months, but the RSV season is known to vary by national regions. Precise delineation of the RSV epidemiology by region could maximize protection from RSV and minimize the cost of RSV immune prophylaxis. ^ The purpose of this thesis is to define the RSV season in Texas over time; compare the RSV season of the state of Texas and its regions with the national norms; and to compare RSV seasonality between the various regions in Texas. ^ This study was a retrospective analysis of data reported to NREVSS to evaluate potential disparities in the onset weeks, offset weeks, and duration of the annual RSV season in Texas. Data were collected from 70 reporting sites, and includes information from the 2004–2005 to 2009–2010 RSV seasons. ^ The observed median onset (week 44) and offset week (week 8) for the Texas were consistent with national estimates for the South. Regional estimates and statistical analysis suggested that the RSV season in Texas would be better represented by regions. Regional seasonal comparisons revealed considerable variation in season offset and duration between many of the geographic regions within Texas. This trend should be studied further.^

The burden of parainfluenza virus infection in patients with hematological malignancy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients in the absence of active immunization and approved therapy: The role of infection control

Background. Community respiratory viruses, mainly RSV and influenza, are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with leukemia and HSCT recipients. The data on impact of PIV infections in these patients is lacking. Methods. We reviewed the records of patients with leukemia and HSCT recipients who developed PIV infection from Oct'02–Nov'07 to determine the outcome of such infections. Results. We identified 200 patients with PIV infections including 80(40%) patients with leukemia and 120 (60%) recipients of HSCT. Median age was 55 y (17-84 y). As compared to HSCT recipients, patients with leukemia had higher APACHE II score (14 vs. 10, p<0.0001); were more likely to have ANC<500 (48% vs. 10%, p<0.0001) and ALC<200 (45% vs. 23.5%, p=0.02). PIV type III was the commonest isolate (172/200, 86%). Most patients 141/200 (70%) had upper respiratory infection (URI), and 59/200 (30%) had pneumonia at presentation. Patients in leukemia group were more likely to require hospitalization due to PIV infection (77% vs. 36% p=0.0001) and were more likely to progress to pneumonia (61% vs. 39%, p=0.002). Fifty five patients received aerosolized ribavirin and/or IVIG. There were no significant differences in the duration of symptoms, length of hospitalization, progression to pneumonia or mortality between the treated verses untreated group. The clinical outcome was unknown in 13 (6%) patients. Complete resolution of symptoms was noted in 91% (171/187) patients and 9% (16/187) patients died. Mortality rate was 17% (16/95) among patients who had PIV pneumonia, with no significant difference between leukemia and HSCT group (16% vs. 17%). The cause of death was acute respiratory failure and/or multi-organ failure in (13, 81%) patients. Conclusions. Patients with leukemia and HSCT could be at high risk for serious PIV infections including PIV pneumonia. Treatment with aerosolized ribavirin and/or IVIG may not have significant effect on the outcome of PIV infection.^

SERIOUS MORBIDITY DUE TO ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH EPIDEMIC INFLUENZA

Current measures of the health impact of epidemic influenza are focused on analyses of death certificate data which may underestimate the true health effect. Previous investigations of influenza-related morbidity have either lacked virologic confirmation of influenza activity in the community or were not population-based. Community virologic surveillance in Houston has demonstrated that influenza viruses have produced epidemics each year since 1974. This study examined the relation of hospitalized for Acute Respiratory Disease (ARD) to the occurrence of influenza epidemics. Considering only Harris County residents, a total of 13,297 ARD hospital discharge records from hospitals representing 48.4% of Harris County hospital beds were compiled for the period July 1978 through June 1981. Variables collected from each discharge included: age, sex, race, dates of admission and discharge, length of stay, discharge disposition and a maximum of five diagnoses. This three year period included epidemics caused by Influenza A/Brazil (H1N1), Influenza B/Singapore, Influenza A/England (H1N1) and Influenza A/Bangkok (H3N2).^ Correlations of both ARD and pneumonia or influenza hospitalizations with indices of community morbidity (specifically, the weekly frequency of virologically-confirmed influenza virus infections) are consistently strong and suggest that hospitalization data reflect the pattern of influenza activity derived from virologic surveillance.^ While 65 percent of the epidemic period hospital deaths occurred in patients who were 65 years of age or older, fewer than 25 percent of epidemic period ARD hospitalizations occurred in persons of that age group. Over 97 percent of epidemic period hospital deaths were accompanied by a chronic underlying illness, however, 45 percent of ARD hospitalizations during epidemics had no mention of underlying illness. Over 2500 persons, approximately 35 percent of all persons hospitalized during the three epidemics, would have been excluded in an analysis for high risk candidates for influenza prophylaxis.^ These results suggest that examination of hospitalizations for ARD may better define the population-at-risk for serious morbidity associated with epidemic influenza. ^