Adult Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare sub-type of RMS. Optimal treatment remains undefined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1995 and 2014, 45 patients were diagnosed and treated in three tertiary sarcoma Centers (United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany). Treatment characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis was 71.5 years (range=28.4-92.8 years). Median survival for those with localised (n=32, 71.1%) and metastatic disease (n=13, 28.9%) were 12.8 months (95% confidence interval=8.2-34.4) and 7.1 months (95% confidence interval=3.8-11.3) respectively. The relapse rate was 53.8% (four local and 10 distant relapses). In total, 14 (31.1%) patients received first line palliative chemotherapy including multi-agent paediatric chemotherapy schedules (n=3), ifosfamide-doxorubicin (n=4) and single-agent doxorubicin (n=7). Response to chemotherapy was poor (one partial remission with vincristine-actinomycin D-cyclophosphamide and six cases with stable disease). Median progression-free survival was 2.3 (range=1.2-7.3) months. CONCLUSION Pleomorphic RMS is an aggressive neoplasm mainly affecting older patients, associated with a high relapse rate, a poor and short-lived response to standard chemotherapy and an overall poor prognosis for both localised and metastatic disease.

Final Results of a Prospective Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Interim Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With R-CHOP-14 (SAKK 38/07)

PURPOSE Our main objective was to prospectively determine the prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after two cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone given every 14 days (R-CHOP-14) under standardized treatment and PET evaluation criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with any stage of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were treated with six cycles of R-CHOP-14 followed by two cycles of rituximab. PET/CT examinations were performed at baseline, after two cycles (and after four cycles if the patient was PET-positive after two cycles), and at the end of treatment. PET/CT examinations were evaluated locally and by central review. The primary end point was event-free survival at 2 years (2-year EFS). RESULTS Median age of the 138 evaluable patients was 58.5 years with a WHO performance status of 0, 1, or 2 in 56%, 36%, or 8% of the patients, respectively. By local assessment, 83 PET/CT scans (60%) were reported as positive and 55 (40%) as negative after two cycles of R-CHOP-14. Two-year EFS was significantly shorter for PET-positive compared with PET-negative patients (48% v 74%; P = .004). Overall survival at 2 years was not significantly different, with 88% for PET-positive versus 91% for PET-negative patients (P = .46). By using central review and the Deauville criteria, 2-year EFS was 41% versus 76% (P < .001) for patients who had interim PET/CT scans after two cycles of R-CHOP-14 and 24% versus 72% (P < .001) for patients who had PET/CT scans at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION Our results confirmed that an interim PET/CT scan has limited prognostic value in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma homogeneously treated with six cycles of R-CHOP-14 in a large prospective trial. At this point, interim PET/CT scanning is not ready for clinical use to guide treatment decisions in individual patients.