New approach in the diagnosis and therapy of hyperphenylalaninemia

Background. Phenylketonuria is the most prevalent inborn error of aminoacid metabolism. Is an autosomal recessive disorder. It results from mutations in the phenylalanine hydroxilase (PAH) gene. Phenotypes can vary from mild hyperphenylalaninemia to a severe phenylketonuria wich, if untreated, results in severe mental retardation. Thanks to neonatal screening programmes, early detection and promp dietetic intervention (phenylalanine restricted diet lifelong) has allowed to avoid neurocognitive complications. Recently, a new therapy is become widely used: the oral supplementation with the PAH cofactor (BH4), wich can alleviate the diet burden. Genotype-phenotype correlation is a reliable tool to predict metabolic phenotype in order to establish a better tailored diet and to assess the potential responsiveness to BH4 therapy. Aim Molecular analysis of the PAH gene, evaluation of genotype-phenotype correlation and prediction of BH4 responsiveness in a group of HPA patients living in Emilia Romagna. Patients and methods. We studied 48 patients affected by PAH deficiency in regular follow-up to our Metabolic Centre. We performed the molecular analysis of these patients using genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood samples Results. We obtained a full genotipic characterization of 46 patients. We found 87 mutant alleles and 35 different mutations, being the most frequent IVS10-11 G>A (19.3%), R261Q (9.1%), R158Q (9.1%), R408Q (6.8%) and A403V (5.7%), including 2 new ones (L287, N223Y) ever described previously. Notably, we found 15 mutations already identified in BH4-responsive patients, according to the literature. We found 42 different genotipic combinations, most of them in single patients and involving a BH4-responsive mutation. Conclusion. BH4 responsiveness is shown by a consistent number of PAH deficient hyperphenylalaninemic patients. This treatment, combined with a less restricted diet or as monotherapy, can reduce nutritional complications and improve the quality of life of these patients.

Evaluation of Antitumoral activity of bone targeted drugs/conventional chemotherapies and identification of biomarkers for the selection of patients with breast cancer for the bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting

Bone metastases are responsible for different clinical complications defined as skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia, bone marrow infiltration and severe bone pain requiring palliative radiotherapy. The general aim of these three years research period was to improve the management of patients with bone metastases through two different approaches of translational research. Firstly in vitro preclinical tests were conducted on breast cancer cells and on indirect co-colture of cancer cells and osteoclasts to evaluate bone targeted therapy singly and in combination with conventional chemotherapy. The study suggests that zoledronic acid has an antitumor activity in breast cancer cell lines. Its mechanism of action involves the decrease of RAS and RHO, as in osteoclasts. Repeated treatment enhances antitumor activity compared to non-repeated treatment. Furthermore the combination Zoledronic Acid + Cisplatin induced a high antitumoral activity in the two triple-negative lines MDA-MB-231 and BRC-230. The p21, pMAPK and m-TOR pathways were regulated by this combined treatment, particularly at lower Cisplatin doses. A co-colture system to test the activity of bone-targeted molecules on monocytes-breast conditioned by breast cancer cells was also developed. Another important criticism of the treatment of breast cancer patients, is the selection of patients who will benefit of bone targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. A retrospective case-control study on breast cancer patients to find new predictive markers of bone metastases in the primary tumors was performed. Eight markers were evaluated and TFF1 and CXCR4 were found to discriminate between patients with relapse to bone respect to patients with no evidence of disease. In particular TFF1 was the most accurate marker reaching a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 79%. This marker could be a useful tool for clinicians to select patients who could benefit for bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting.