Estimativa do custo médio ponderado de capital em produtos agrícolas

Pós-graduação em Agronomia (Energia na Agricultura) - FCA

A crítica de Mandelbrot: normalidade como exceção e não como regra

Starting with a brief introduction about the evolution of asset pricing models, we seek here to introduce the critique made by Benoit Mandelbrot about using the normality hypothesis when building such models. This critique arises when empirical and theoretical models where confronted and the expected results diverged from the ones obtained. Next, we reproduce Mandelbrot alternative which he believes is sufficient to solve the main problems implied by the normality hyphotesis

Testing option pricing with the Edgeworth expansion

There is a well-developed framework, the Black-Scholes theory, for the pricing of contracts based on the future prices of certain assets, called options. This theory assumes that the probability distribution of the returns of the underlying asset is a Gaussian distribution. However, it is observed in the market that this hypothesis is flawed, leading to the introduction of a fudge factor, the so-called volatility smile. Therefore, it would be interesting to explore extensions of the Black-Scholes theory to non-Gaussian distributions. In this paper, we provide an explicit formula for the price of an option when the distributions of the returns of the underlying asset is parametrized by an Edgeworth expansion, which allows for the introduction of higher independent moments of the probability distribution, namely skewness and kurtosis. We test our formula with options in the Brazilian and American markets, showing that the volatility smile can be reduced. We also check whether our approach leads to more efficient hedging strategies of these instruments. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.