Relationship between genotype and enzyme activity of glutathione S-transferases M1 and P1 in Chinese

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are the major detoxifying Phase II enzyme for eliminating electrophilic compounds. Mutations in GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 in Caucasian and GSTA1 in Chinese have been found to reduce enzyme activity. However, data on the impact of common genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTP1 on enzyme activity in Chinese is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the effect of common GSTP1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms on erythrocyte GST activity in healthy Chinese (n = 196). GSTM1 null mutation (GSTM1*0) was analyzed by a PCR-Multiplex procedure, whereas GSTP1 313A → G polymorphism (resulting in Ile105Val at codon 105) was analyzed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Erythrocyte GST activity was measured using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitro-bezene (CDNB) as the model substrate. The frequency of GSTM1 null genotype was 54.3% and the frequency of GSTP1-Ile/Ile, -Ile/Val, and -Val/Val genotype was 60.7%, 35.2% and 4.1%, respectively, with a frequency of 21.7% for the 105 valine allele. Age, gender and smoking did not significantly affect the erythrocyte GST activities. The mean erythrocyte GST enzyme activity for GSTP1*-Ile/Val genotype group (3.53 ± 0.63 U/g Hb) was significantly lower than that for subjects with GSTP1-Ile/Ile genotype (4.25 ± 1.07 U/g Hb, P = 0.004), while subjects with the GSTP1-Val/Val genotype had the lowest enzyme activity (2.44 ± 0.67 U/g Hb). In addition, the GST activity in carriers of GSTM1*0/GSTP1-Ile/Ile was significantly higher than that of subjects inherited GSTM1*0/GSTP1-Ile/Val or GSTM1*0/GSTP1-Val/Val. However, there is no association between GSTM1 null mutation and reduced enzyme activity. GSTP1 codon 105 mutation led to reduced erythrocyte GST activity in Chinese. A combined GSTP1 and GSTM1 null mutations also resulted in significantly reduced GST activity. Further studies are needed to explore the clinical implications of GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms.

Genetic polymorphisms in glutathione-S-transferases are associated with anxiety and mood disorders in nicotine dependence

Nicotine dependence is associated with an increased risk of mood and anxiety disorders and suicide. The primary hypothesis of this study was to identify whether the polymorphisms of two glutathione-S-transferase enzymes (GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes) predict an increased risk of mood and anxiety disorders in smokers with nicotine dependence.

Relationship of glutathione S-transferase genotypes with side-effects of pulsed cyclophsphamide therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Aims
Cyclophosphamide (CTX) is an established treatment of severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Cytotoxic CTX metabolites are mainly detoxified by multiple glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). However, data are lacking on the relationship between the short-term side-effects of CTX therapy and GST genotypes. In the present study, the effects of common GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genetic mutations on the severity of myelosuppression, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and infection incidences induced by pulsed CTX therapy were evaluated in patients SLE.
Methods
DNA was extracted from peripheral leucocytes in patients with confirmed SLE diagnosis (n = 102). GSTM1 and GSTT1 null mutations were analyzed by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-multiplex procedure, whereas the GSTP1 codon 105 polymorphism (Ile→Val) was analyzed by a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay.
Results
Our study demonstrated that SLE patients carrying the genotypes with GSTP1 codon 105 mutation [GSTP1*-105I/V (heterozygote) and GSTP1*-105 V/V (homozygote)] had an increased risk of myelotoxicity when treated with pulsed high-dose CTX therapy (Odds ratio (OR) 5.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96, 12.76); especially in patients younger than 30 years (OR 7.50, 95% CI 2.14, 26.24), or in patients treated with a total CTX dose greater than 1.0 g (OR 12.88, 95% CI 3.16, 52.57). Similarly, patients with these genotypes (GSTP1*I/V and GSTP1*V/V) also had an increased risk of GI toxicity when treated with an initial pulsed high-dose CTX regimen (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.03, 10.79). However, GSTM1 and GSTT1 null mutations did not significantly alter the risks of these short-term side-effects of pulsed high-dose CTX therapy in SLE patients.
Conclusions
The GSTP1 codon 105 polymorphism, but not GSTM1 or GSTT1 null mutations, significantly increased the risks of short-term side-effects of pulsed high-dose CTX therapy in SLE patients. Because of the lack of selective substrates for a GST enzyme phenotyping study, timely detection of this mutation on codon 105 may assist in optimizing pulsed high-dose CTX therapy in SLE patients.

Metabolism and transport of oxazphosphorines and the clinical implications

The oxazaphosphorines including cyclophosphamide (CPA), ifosfamide (IFO), and trofosfamide represent an important group of therapeutic agents due to their substantial antitumor and immuno-modulating activity. CPA is widely used as an anticancer drug, an immunosuppressant, and for the mobilization of hematopoetic progenitor cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood prior to bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia, leukemia, and other malignancies. New oxazaphosphorines derivatives have been developed in an attempt to improve selectivity and response with reduced toxicity. These derivatives include mafosfamide (NSC 345842), glufosfamide (D19575, β-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard), NSC 612567 (aldophosphamide perhydrothiazine), and NSC 613060 (aldophosphamide thiazolidine). This review highlights the metabolism and transport of these oxazaphosphorines (mainly CPA and IFO, as these two oxazaphosphorine drugs are the most widely used alkylating agents) and the clinical implications. Both CPA and IFO are prodrugs that require activation by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed 4-hydroxylation, yielding cytotoxic nitrogen mustards capable of reacting with DNA molecules to form crosslinks and lead to cell apoptosis and/or necrosis. Such prodrug activation can be enhanced within tumor cells by the CYP-based gene directed-enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) approach. However, those newly synthesized oxazaphosphorine derivatives such as glufosfamide, NSC 612567 and NSC 613060, do not need hepatic activation. They are activated through other enzymatic and/or non-enzymatic pathways. For example, both NSC 612567 and NSC 613060 can be activated by plain phosphodiesterase (PDEs) in plasma and other tissues or by the high-affinity nuclear 3'-5' exonucleases associated with DNA polymerases, such as DNA polymerases and ε. The alternative CYP-catalyzed inactivation pathway by N-dechloroethylation generates the neurotoxic and nephrotoxic byproduct chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Various aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are involved in the detoxification of oxazaphosphorine metabolites. The metabolism of oxazaphosphorines is auto-inducible, with the activation of the orphan nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) being the major mechanism. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism is affected by a number of factors associated with the drugs (e.g., dosage, route of administration, chirality, and drug combination) and patients (e.g., age, gender, renal and hepatic function). Several drug transporters, such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRP1, MRP2, and MRP4) are involved in the active uptake and efflux of parental oxazaphosphorines, their cytotoxic mustards and conjugates in hepatocytes and tumor cells. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism and transport have a major impact on pharmacokinetic variability, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, toxicity, resistance, and drug interactions since the drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters involved are key determinants of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxazaphosphorines. A better understanding of the factors that affect the metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines is important for their optional use in cancer chemotherapy.

The Glutathione System: a new drug target in neuroimmune disorders

Glutathione (GSH) has a crucial role in cellular signaling and antioxidant defenses either by reacting directly with reactive oxygen or nitrogen species or by acting as an essential cofactor for GSH S-transferases and glutathione peroxidases. GSH acting in concert with its dependent enzymes, known as the glutathione system, is responsible for the detoxification of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) and electrophiles produced by xenobiotics. Adequate levels of GSH are essential for the optimal functioning of the immune system in general and T cell activation and differentiation in particular. GSH is a ubiquitous regulator of the cell cycle per se. GSH also has crucial functions in the brain as an antioxidant, neuromodulator, neurotransmitter, and enabler of neuron survival. Depletion of GSH leads to exacerbation of damage by oxidative and nitrosative stress; hypernitrosylation; increased levels of proinflammatory mediators and inflammatory potential; dysfunctions of intracellular signaling networks, e.g., p53, nuclear factor-κB, and Janus kinases; decreased cell proliferation and DNA synthesis; inactivation of complex I of the electron transport chain; activation of cytochrome c and the apoptotic machinery; blockade of the methionine cycle; and compromised epigenetic regulation of gene expression. As such, GSH depletion has marked consequences for the homeostatic control of the immune system, oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS) pathways, regulation of energy production, and mitochondrial survival as well. GSH depletion and concomitant increase in O&NS and mitochondrial dysfunctions play a role in the pathophysiology of diverse neuroimmune disorders, including depression, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and Parkinson’s disease, suggesting that depleted GSH is an integral part of these diseases. Therapeutical interventions that aim to increase GSH concentrations in vivo include N-acetyl cysteine; Nrf-2 activation via hyperbaric oxygen therapy; dimethyl fumarate; phytochemicals, including curcumin, resveratrol, and cinnamon; and folate supplementation.

Upregulation of glutathione-related genes and enzyme activities in cultured human cells by sublethgal concentrations of inorganic arsenic

Inorganic arsenic (jAs), a known human carcinogen, acts as a tumor promoter in part by inducing a rapid burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mammalian cells. This causes oxidative stress and a subsequent increase in the level of cellular glutathione (GSH). Glutathione, a ubiquitous reducing sulfhydryl tripeptide, is involved in ROS detoxification and its increase may be part of an adaptive response to the oxidative stress. Glutathione related enzymes including glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) also play key roles in these processes. In this study the regulatory effects of inorganic arsenite (As111) on the activities of GSH-related enzymes were investigated in cultured human keratinocytes. Substantial increases in GR enzyme activity and mRNA levels were shown in keratinocytes and other human cell lines after exposure to low, subtoxic, micromolar concentrations of As111 for 24 h. Upregulation of GSH synthesis paralleled the upregulation of GR as shown by increases in glutamatecysteine lyase (GeL) enzyme activity and mRNA levels, cystine uptake, and intracellular GSH levels. Glutathione S-transferase activity was also shown to increase slightly in keratinocytes, but not in fibroblasts or breast tumor cells. Overall the results show that sublethal arsenic induces a multicomponent response in human keratinocytes that involves upregulation of parts, but not all of the GSH system and counteracts the acute toxic effects of jAs. The upregulation of GR has not previously been shown to be an integral part of this response, although GR is critical for maintaining levels of reduced GSH.

In vitro effect of arsenical compounds on glutathione-related enzymes

The mechanism of arsenic toxicity is believed to be due to the ability of arsenite (AsIII) to bind protein thiols. Glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant cellular thiol, and both GSH and GSH-related enzymes are important antioxidants that play an important role in the detoxification of arsenic and other carcinogens. The effect of arsenic on the activity of a variety of enzymes that use GSH has been determined using purified preparations of glutathione reductase (GR) from yeast and bovine glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and equine glutathione S-transferase (GST). The effect on enzyme activity of increasing concentrations (from 1 μM to 100 mM) of commercial sodium arsenite (AsIII) and sodium arsenate (AsV) and a prepared arsenic(III)−glutathione complex [AsIII(GS)3] and methylarsenous diiodide (CH3AsIII) has been examined.

Role of glutathione in schizophrenia? The effect of brain glutathione depletion on prepulse inhibition (PPI) in rats and mice

Reductions in brain glutathione (GSH) levels have been reported in schizophrenia. We investigated the effects of brain GSH depletion on prepulse inhibition (PPI), a model of sensorimotor gating which is disrupted in individuals with schizophrenia. It was hypothesized that GSH depletion would lead to disruption of PPI similar to that seen in schizophrenia and enhance the effect of increased dopamine release by amphetamine. Sprague-Dawley rats and C57Bl/6 mice were treated with saline or 2-cyclohexene-1-one (CHX, 75 mg/kg and 120 mg/kg respectively) to deplete brain GSH. 225 minutes later the animals were injected with amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg in rats and 25 mg/kg in mice). Total brain GSH levels were measured using an enzymatic recycling assay. Surprisingly, in rats CHX treatment prevented the disruption of PPI by amphetamine. Thus, while there was the expected disruption of PPI caused by amphetamine on its own (average %PPI reduced from 58 ± 5 to 44 ± 4), in combination with CHX, amphetamine had no significant effect (67 ± 4 vs. 63 ± 3, respectively). In contrast to rats, in mice CHX had no effect on PPI. Thus, amphetamine similarly disrupted PPI after saline (41 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 5) and CHX pretreatment (45 ± 6 vs. 26 ± 5). There were significant 40-63% depletions of GSH in frontal cortex and striatum of CHX-treated rats and mice. These data show that GSH depletion in the brain by CHX treatment did not induce the expected decrease in PPI. Because the levels of GSH depletion in this study were similar to those found in schizophrenia, these results cast doubt on a direct interaction between brain GSH levels and PPI disruption in this illness. In rats, CHX treatment prevented the disruption of PPI caused by amphetamine. We have observed that resting levels of GSH are lower in rats than in mice. It is plausible that some oxidative damage may occur after amphetamine treatment alone, which induces marked release of the electroactive species, dopamine. In mice with their higher levels of GSH (either with or without CHX treatment) and in control rats, this does not cause functional effects. However, in CHX-treated rats GSH levels are reduced to a point where amphetamine-induced dopamine release may cause increased metabolism and lipid peroxidation inducing a decrease in postsynaptic dopamine receptor function and consequently leading to an apparent inhibition of the disruption of PPI. In conclusion, while individuals with schizophrenia show disruption of PPI and reduced brain GSH levels, in rats and mice brain GSH depletion alone does not impact on PPI. In combination with a hyperdopaminergic state, functional effects on PPI regulation were found. These effects warrant further investigation.