1 resultado para Ethics in animal research
em WestminsterResearch - UK
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (59)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (11)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (36)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (156)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (7)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (6)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (405)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (86)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (82)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (21)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (6)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
To be legitimate, research needs to be ethical, methodologically sound, of sufficient value to justify public expenditure and be transparent. Animal research has always been contested on ethical grounds, but there is now mounting evidence of poor scientific method, and growing doubts about its clinical value. So what of transparency? Here we examine the increasing focus on openness within animal research in the UK, analysing recent developments within the Home Office and within the main group representing the interests of the sector, Understanding Animal Research. We argue that, while important steps are being taken toward greater transparency, the legitimacy of animal research continues to be undermined by selective openness. We propose that openness could be increased through public involvement, and that this would bring about much needed improvements in animal research, as it has done in clinical research.