Dyslipidemia and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Topic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of dyslipidemia and diabetic macular edema (DME). 

Clinical Relevance: Diabetic macular edema causes impairment of vision in patients with diabetes, and dyslipidemia has been reported as a risk factor for its development. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the evidence of an association between dyslipidemia and DME. 

Methods: We defined eligibility criteria as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies reporting on the relationship between blood lipid levels and DME. We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to September 2014. We used the NewcastleeOttawa scale to assess the quality of case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. 

Results: The search strategy identified 4959 publications. After screening, we selected 21 articles for review (5 cross-sectional, 5 cohort, 7 case-control, and 4 RCTs). Meta-analysis of case-control studies revealed that mean levels of total serum cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), and serum triglycerides (TGs) were significantly higher in patients with DME compared with those without DME (TC: 30.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.14e39.02; P < 0.001; LDL: 18.62; 95% CI, 5.80e31.43; P < 0.05; TG: 24.82; 95% CI, 9.21e40.42; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis of RCTs did not show significant risk in worsening of hard exudates and severity of DME in the lipid-lowering group compared with placebo (hard exudates: relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.47e2.11; P ¼ 1.00; DME: relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.75e1.86; P ¼ 0.48). 

Conclusions: Despite evidence from the cohort studies and meta-analysis of the case-control studies suggesting a strong relationship between lipid levels and DME, this was not confirmed by the meta-analysis that included only prospective RCTs. Therefore, given the significant public health relevance of the topic, the relationship between lipid levels and DME deserves further investigation.

Determinants of postoperative corneal edema and impact on goldmann intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: Recent studies report that increased corneal edema because of contact lens wear under closed lids is associated with elevated Goldmann intraocular pressure (GAT IOP). We sought to assess whether the impact of postoperative corneal edema on GAT IOP would be similar and to determine the differential effect of different amounts of edema. METHODS: The setting is a tertiary level cataract clinic in Shantou, China. Pre- and postoperative (day 1) GAT IOP, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and radius of corneal curvature were measured for consecutive patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery by 2 experienced surgeons. Corneal edema was calculated as the percentage increase in CCT. RESULTS: Among 136 subjects (mean age, 62.5 ± 15.4 years; 53.7% women), the mean increase in CCT was 10.3% postoperatively. Greater corneal edema was associated with lower GAT IOP in unadjusted analyses (P < 0.03) and in linear regression models (P < 0.01). In the model, higher corneal resistance factor (P < 0.001), lower corneal hysteresis (P < 0.001), and steeper radius of corneal curvature (P < 0.001) were associated with higher GAT IOP. Among subjects with edema < the median, edema was associated with lower GAT IOP (P = 0.004), whereas among those with edema ≥ the median, edema was not associated with GAT IOP. An increase in CCT of 7% was associated with an 8 mm Hg underestimation of GAT IOP in our models. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of postoperative edema on GAT IOP seems to be the opposite of contact lens-induced edema. The magnitude of the effect is potentially relevant to patient management.