1 resultado para NATIONAL-HEALTH
em Ecology and Society
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (7)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (62)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (24)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (35)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (113)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (20)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (38)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (9)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (7)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (38)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (98)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (15)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (70)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (18)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (15)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (33)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (6)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (27)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (57)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (20)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
As the global population becomes increasingly urban, research is needed to explore how local culture, land use, and policy will influence urban natural resource management. We used a broad-scale comparative approach and survey of residents within the Portland (Oregon)-Vancouver (Washington) metropolitan areas, USA, two states with similar geographical and ecological characteristics, but different approaches to land-use planning, to explore resident perceptions about natural resources at three scales of analysis: property level (“at or near my house”), neighborhood (“within a 20-minute walk from my house”), and metro level (“across the metro area”). At the metro-level scale, nonmetric multidimensional scaling revealed that the two cities were quite similar. However, affinity for particular landscape characteristics existed within each city with the greatest difference generally at the property-level scale. Portland respondents expressed affinity for large mature trees, tree-lined streets, public transportation, and proximity to stores and services. Vancouver respondents expressed affinity for plentiful accessible parking. We suggest three explanations that likely are not mutually exclusive. First, respondents are segmented based on preferences for particular amenities, such as convenience versus commuter needs. Second, historical land-use and tax policy legacies may influence individual decisions. Third, more environmentally attuned worldviews may influence an individual’s desire to produce environmentally friendly outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of acknowledging variations in residents’ affinities for landscape characteristics across different scales and locations because these differences may influence future land-use policies about urban natural resources.