1 resultado para Customer satisfaction measurement
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (41)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (7)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (6)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (79)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (14)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (4)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (454)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (15)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (19)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (6)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (27)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (25)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (15)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Academics across the country are having an allergic reaction to the corporate model of operation being adopted by many universities. Terms like branding, collateral materials, budget controls, marketing strategies, and outcomes are causing a panic among faculty who believe that a customer satisfaction approach to higher education is anti-intellectual and that it leads to grade inflation, teaching toward evaluations, and learning as product, not process. Honors programs in particular, often the standard bearers of undergraduate academic standards, are being asked to market themselves not only to the top prospective students, but also to the university administration at large. Honors is frequently the default focus group expected to show the rest of the university programs and departments ‘How it is done,’ or rather, ‘How it is done according to standard.’ By ‘it,’ of course, I mean marketing our curriculum, selling our program, and branding our product.