Stimulation of apolipoprotein D secretion by steroids coincides with inhibition of cell proliferation in human LNCaP prostate cancer cells

Although steroid hormones are known to play a predominant role in the regulation of cell growth in hormone-sensitive cancers, their mechanisms of action, especially their interaction with growth factors and/or growth inhibitors, is poorly understood. We have recently observed that the effects of androgens and estrogens on the expression of the major protein found in human breast gross cystic disease fluid, protein-24, are opposite to their respective action on cell proliferation in human breast cancer cell lines. Somewhat surprisingly, the recent elucidation of the amino acid sequence of this progesterone binding protein reveals that this tumor marker is apolipoprotein D (apo D), a member of a superfamily of lipophilic ligand carrier proteins. The present study was designed to determine whether apo D is secreted by human prostate cancer cells and could thus be a new marker of steroid action in these cancer cells, and whether the sex steroid-induced stimulation of apo D secretion coincides with inhibition of cell proliferation. We took advantage of the biphasic pattern of the effect of steroids on the proliferation of the human prostate cancer LNCaP cell line, which offers the opportunity to discriminate between positive and negative steroid receptor-regulated cell growth processes. A 10-day exposure to low concentrations of dihydrotestosterone and testosterone caused a potent stimulation of LNCaP cell proliferation, whereas incubation with higher concentrations of these androgens led to a progressive decrease in cell proliferation towards basal levels. The biphasic action of androgens was also observed on apo D secretion, the effects on apo D secretion being inversely related to their action on LNCaP cell proliferation. Similar opposite biphasic effects were also observed with 9 other steroids, thus indicating that the stimulation of secretion of this new biochemical marker coincides with inhibition of cell proliferation in LNCaP human prostatic cancer cells.

The NRF-1/α-PAL transcription factor regulates human E2F6 promoter activity

E2F6 is widely expressed in human tissues and cell lines. Recent studies have demonstrated its involvement in developmental patterning and in the regulation of various genes implicated in chromatin remodelling. Despite a growing number of studies, nothing is really known concerning the E2F6 expression regulation. To understand how cells control E2F6 expression, we analysed the activity of the previously cloned promoter region of the human E2F6 gene. DNase I footprinting, gel electrophoretic-mobility shift, transient transfection and site-directed mutagenesis experiments allowed the identification of two functional NRF-1/α-PAL (nuclear respiratory factor-1/α-palindrome-binding protein)-binding sites within the human E2F6 core promoter region, which are conserved in the mouse and rat E2F6 promoter region. Moreover, ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation) analysis demonstrated that overexpressed NRF-1/α-PAL is associated in vivo with the E2F6 promoter. Furthermore, overexpression of full-length NRF-1/α-PAL enhanced E2F6 promoter activity, whereas expression of its dominant-negative form reduced the promoter activity. Our results indicate that NRF-1/α-PAL is implicated in the regulation of basal E2F6 gene expression.

Expression of the Ets transcription factor Erm is regulated through a conventional PKC signaling pathway in the Molt4 lymphoblastic cell line.

Erm, a member of the PEA3 group within the Ets family of transcription factors, is expressed in murine and human lymphocytes. Here, we show that in the human Molt4 lymphoblastic cell line, the erm gene expression is regulated by the conventional PKC (cPKC) pathway. To better characterize the molecular mechanism by which cPKC regulates Erm transcription in Molt4 cells, we tested proximal promoter deletions of the human gene, and identified a specific cPKC-regulated region between positions -420 and -115 upstream of the first exon.

Physiological levels of PTEN control the size of the cellular Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 pool

To understand how a signaling molecule's activities are regulated, we need insight into the processes controlling the dynamic balance between its synthesis and degradation. For the Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 signal, this information is woefully inadequate. For example, the only known cytosolic enzyme with the capacity to degrade Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 is the tumour-suppressor PTEN [J.J. Caffrey, T. Darden, M.R. Wenk, S.B. Shears, FEBS Lett. 499 (2001) 6 ], but the biological relevance has been questioned by others [E.A. Orchiston, D. Bennett, N.R. Leslie, R.G. Clarke, L. Winward, C.P. Downes, S.T. Safrany, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 1116 ]. The current study emphasizes the role of physiological levels of PTEN in Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 homeostasis. We employed two cell models. First, we used a human U87MG glioblastoma PTEN-null cell line that hosts an ecdysone-inducible PTEN expression system. Second, the human H1299 bronchial cell line, in which PTEN is hypomorphic due to promoter methylation, has been stably transfected with physiologically relevant levels of PTEN. In both models, a novel consequence of PTEN expression was to increase Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 pool size by 30-40% (p<0.01); this response was wortmannin-insensitive and, therefore, independent of the PtdIns 3-kinase pathway. In U87MG cells, induction of the G129R catalytically inactive PTEN mutant did not affect Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P(5) levels. PTEN induction did not alter the expression of enzymes participating in Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 synthesis. Another effect of PTEN expression in U87MG cells was to decrease InsP6 levels by 13% (p<0.02). The InsP6-phosphatase, MIPP, may be responsible for the latter effect; we show that recombinant human MIPP dephosphorylates InsP6 to D/L-Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5, levels of which increased 60% (p<0.05) following PTEN expression in U87MG cells. Overall, our data add higher inositol phosphates to the list of important cellular regulators [Y. Huang, R.P. Wernyj, D.D. Norton, P. Precht, M.C. Seminario, R.L. Wange, Oncogene, 24 (2005) 3819 ] the levels of which are modulated by expression of the highly pleiotropic PTEN protein.