1 resultado para Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
em Boston University Digital Common
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (6)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (13)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (7)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (24)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (14)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (10)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (13)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (43)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (7)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (2)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (18)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (27)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (47)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (106)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (11)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: In a 1994 Ninth Circuit decision on the remand of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Judge Alex Kosinski wrote that science done for the purpose of litigation should be subject to more stringent standards of admissibility than other science. OBJECTIVES: We analyze this proposition by considering litigation-generated science as a subset of science involving conflict of interest. DISCUSSION: Judge Kosinski's formulation suggests there may be reasons to treat science involving conflict of interest differently but raises questions about whether litigation-generated science should be singled out. In particular we discuss the similar problems raised by strategically motivated science done in anticipation of possible future litigation or otherwise designed to benefit the sponsor and ask what special treatment, if any, should be given to science undertaken to support existing or potential future litigation. CONCLUSION: The problems with litigation-generated science are not special. On the contrary, they are very general and apply to much or most science that is relevant and reliable in the courtroom setting.