2 resultados para posttranslational modifications

em Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Resumen: Este trabajo pretende contribuir a una producción historiográfica en desarrollo en los últimos años cuyo objetivo es el estudio de los discursos y prácticas de un conjunto de juristas argentinos adherentes al positivismo penal que desde fines del siglo XIX impulsaron una serie de iniciativas de reforma penal y penitenciaria (creación y dirección de instituciones carcelarias y post penitenciarias; renovación de la producción científica y universitaria; elaboración de propuestas legislativas; etc.). En esta ocasión, analizaremos la figura de Julio Herrera, uno de los más distinguidos penalistas argentinos, aunque paradójicamente ignorado por los estudios históricos e histórico-jurídicos, centrándonos en su intervención parlamentaria con motivo del proyecto de reforma del código penal presentado en la Cámara de Senadores en 1903.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Abstract: Focusing on Obadiah and Psalm 137, this article provides biblical evidence for an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah during the Babylonian crisis ca. 588–586 B.C.E. After setting a context that includes the use of treaties in the ancient Near East to establish expectations for political relationships and the likelihood that Edom could operate as a political entity in the Judahite Negev during the Babylonian assault, this article demonstrates that Obadiah’s poetics include a density of inverted form and content (a reversal motif) pointing to treaty betrayal. Obadiah’s modifications of Jeremiah 49, a text with close thematic and terminological parallels, evidence an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah. Moreover, the study shows that Obadiah is replete with treaty allusions. A study of Psalm 137 in comparison with Aramaic treaty texts from Sefire reveals that this difficult psalm also evidences a treaty betrayal by Edom and includes elements appropriate for treaty curses. The article closes with a discussion of piecemeal data from a few other biblical texts, a criticism of the view that Edom was innocent during the Babylonian crisis, and a suggestion that this treaty betrayal may have contributed to the production of some anti-Edom biblical material.