Evidence that two present-day components needed for the genetic code appeared after nucleated cells separated from eubacteria.

The trinucleotide/amino acid relationships of the present-day genetic code are established by the amino-acylation reactions of tRNA synthetases, whereby each of 20 specific amino acids is attached to its cognate tRNAs, which bear anticodon trinucleotides. Because of its universality, the appearance of the modern genetic code is thought to predate the separation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms in the universal phylogenetic tree. In the light of new sequence information, we present here a phylogenetic analysis that shows an unusual picture for tyrosyl- and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetases. Ij particular, the eukaryotic tyrosyl- and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetases are more related to each other than to their respective prokaryotic counterparts. In contrast, each of the other 18 eukaryotic synthetases is more related to its prokaryotic counterpart than to any eukaryotic synthetase specific for a different amino acid. Our results raise the possibility that present day tyrosyl- and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetases appeared after the separation of nucleated cells from eubacteria. The results have implications for the development of the genetic code.

Four primordial modes of tRNA-synthetase recognition, determined by the (G,C) operational code

In distinction to single-stranded anticodons built of G, C, A, and U bases, their presumable double-stranded precursors at the first three positions of the acceptor stem are composed almost invariably of G-C and C-G base pairs. Thus, the “second” operational RNA code responsible for correct aminoacylation seems to be a (G,C) code preceding the classic genetic code. Although historically rooted, the two codes were destined to diverge quite early. However, closer inspection revealed that two complementary catalytic domains of class I and class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) multiplied by two, also complementary, G2-C71 and C2-G71 targets in tRNA acceptors, yield four (2 × 2) different modes of recognition. It appears therefore that the core four-column organization of the genetic code, associated with the most conservative central base of anticodons and codons, was in essence predetermined by these four recognition modes of the (G,C) operational code. The general conclusion follows that the genetic code per se looks like a “frozen accident” but only beyond the “2 × 2 = 4” scope. The four primordial modes of tRNA–aaRS recognition are amenable to direct experimental verification.

Class I release factors in ciliates with variant genetic codes

In eukaryotes with the universal genetic code a single class I release factor (eRF1) most probably recognizes all stop codons (UAA, UAG and UGA) and is essential for termination of nascent peptide synthesis. It is well established that stop codons have been reassigned to amino acid codons at least three times among ciliates. The codon specificities of ciliate eRF1s must have been modified to accommodate the variant codes. In this study we have amplified, cloned and sequenced eRF1 genes of two hypotrichous ciliates, Oxytricha trifallax (UAA and UAG for Gln) and Euplotes aediculatus (UGA for Cys). We also sequenced/identified three protist and two archaeal class I RF genes to enlarge the database of eRF1/aRF1s with the universal code. Extensive comparisons between universal code eRF1s and those of Oxytricha, Euplotes and Tetrahymena, which represent three lineages that acquired variant codes independently, provide important clues to identify stop codon-binding regions in eRF1. Domain 1 in the five ciliate eRF1s, particulary the TASNIKS heptapeptide and its adjacent region, differs significantly from domain 1 in universal code eRF1s. This observation suggests that domain 1 contains the codon recognition site, but that the mechanism of eRF1 codon recognition may be more complex than proposed by Nakamura et al. or Knight and Landweber.

Operational RNA code for amino acids: species-specific aminoacylation of minihelices switched by a single nucleotide.

The genetic code is based on aminoacylation reactions where specific amino acids are attached to tRNAs bearing anticodon trinucleotides. However, the anticodon-independent specific aminoacylation of RNA minihelix substrates by bacterial and yeast tRNA synthetases suggested an operational RNA code for amino acids whereby specific RNA sequences/structures in tRNA acceptor stems correspond to specific amino acids. Because of the possible significance of the operational RNA code for the development of the genetic code, we investigated aminoacylation of synthetic RNA minihelices with a human enzyme to understand the sequences needed for that aminoacylation compared with those needed for a microbial system. We show here that the species-specific aminoacylation of glycine tRNAs is recapitulated by a species-specific aminoacylation of minihelices. Although the mammalian and Escherichia coli minihelices differ at 6 of 12 base pairs, two of the three nucleotides essential for aminoacylation by the E. coli enzyme are conserved in the mammalian minihelix. The two conserved nucleotides were shown to be also important for aminoacylation of the mammalian minihelix by the human enzyme. A simple interchange of the differing nucleotide enabled the human enzyme to now charge the bacterial substrate and not the mammalian minihelix. Conversely, this interchange made the bacterial enzyme specific for the mammalian substrate. Thus, the positional locations (if not the actual nucleotides) for the operational RNA code for glycine appear conserved from bacteria to mammals.

Specific atomic groups and RNA helix geometry in acceptor stem recognition by a tRNA synthetase

Oligonucleotides that recapitulate the acceptor stems of tRNAs are substrates for aminoacylation by many tRNA synthetases in vitro, even though these substrates are missing the anticodon trinucleotides of the genetic code. In the case of tRNAAla a single acceptor stem G⋅U base pair at position 3·70 is essential, based on experiments where the wobble pair has been replaced by alternatives such as I⋅U, G⋅C, and A⋅U, among others. These experiments led to the conclusion that the minor-groove free 2-amino group (of guanosine) of the G⋅U wobble pair is essential for charging. Moreover, alanine-inserting tRNAs (amber suppressors) that replace G⋅U with mismatches such as G⋅A and C⋅A are partially active in vivo and can support growth of an Escherichia coli tRNAAla knockout strain, leading to the hypothesis that a helix irregularity and nucleotide functionalities are important for recognition. Herein we investigate the charging in vitro of oligonucleotide and full-length tRNA substrates that contain mismatches at the position of the G⋅U pair. Although most of these substrates have undetectable activity, G⋅A and C⋅A variants retain some activity, which is, nevertheless, reduced by at least 100-fold. Thus, the in vivo assays are much less sensitive to large changes in aminoacylation kinetic efficiency of 3·70 variants than is the in vitro assay system. Although these functional data do not clarify all of the details, it is now clear that specific atomic groups are substantially more important in determining kinetic efficiency than is a helical distortion. By implication, the activity of mutant tRNAs measured in the in vivo assays appears to be more dependent on factors other than aminoacylation kinetic efficiency.

A double-stranded RNA element from a hypovirulent strain of Rhizoctonia solani occurs in DNA form and is genetically related to the pentafunctional AROM protein of the shikimate pathway

M2 is a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) element occurring in the hypovirulent isolate Rhs 1A1 of the plant pathogenic basidiomycete Rhizoctonia solani. Rhs 1A1 originated as a sector of the virulent field isolate Rhs 1AP, which contains no detectable amount of the M2 dsRNA. The complete sequence (3,570 bp) of the M2 dsRNA has been determined. A 6.9-kbp segment of total DNA from either Rhs 1A1 or Rhs 1AP hybridizes with an M2-specific cDNA probe. The sequences of M2 dsRNA and of PCR products generated from Rhs 1A1 total DNA were found to be identical. Thus this report describes a fungal host containing full-length DNA copies of a dsRNA element. A major portion of the M2 dsRNA is located in the cytoplasm, whereas a smaller amount is found in mitochondria. Based on either the universal or the mitochondrial genetic code of filamentous fungi, one strand of M2 encodes a putative protein of 754 amino acids. The resulting polypeptide has all four motifs of a dsRNA viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDRP) and is phylogenetically related to the RDRP of a mitochondrial dsRNA associated with hypovirulence in strain NB631 of Cryphonectria parasitica, incitant of chestnut blight. This polypeptide also has significant sequence similarity with two domains of a pentafunctional polypeptide, which catalyzes the five central steps of the shikimate pathway in yeast and filamentous fungi.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases database

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) are at the center of the question of the origin of life. They constitute a family of enzymes integrating the two levels of cellular organization: nucleic acids and proteins. AARSs arose early in evolution and are believed to be a group of ancient proteins. They are responsible for attaching amino acid residues to their cognate tRNA molecules, which is the first step in the protein synthesis. The role they play in a living cell is essential for the precise deciphering of the genetic code. The analysis of AARSs evolutionary history was not possible for a long time due to a lack of a sufficiently large number of their amino acid sequences. The emerging picture of synthetases’ evolution is a result of recent achievements in genomics [Woese,C., Olsen,G.J., Ibba,M. and Söll,D. (2000) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 64, 202–236]. In this paper we present a short introduction to the AARSs database. The updated database contains 1047 AARS primary structures from archaebacteria, eubacteria, mitochondria, chloroplasts and eukaryotic cells. It is the compilation of amino acid sequences of all AARSs known to date, which are available as separate entries via the WWW at http://biobase s.ibch.poznan.pl/aars/.

Testing ancient RNA–protein interactions

The past decade in molecular biology has seen remarkable advances in the study of the origin and early evolution of life. The mathematical tools for analyzing DNA and protein sequences, coupled with the availability of complete microbial genome sequences, provide insight almost as far back as the age of the nucleic acids themselves. Experimental evolution in the laboratory and especially in vitro evolution of RNA provide insight into a hypothetical world where RNA, or a close relative, may have debuted as a primary functional and informational molecule. The ability to isolate new functional RNAs from random sequences now ultimately makes the world of possible primitive chemical interactions accessible even when the molecules or reactions are no longer present in modern species. Thus we can at last form direct experimental tests of specific models for the origin of RNA–protein associations, such as those that influenced the genetic code. This marks a turning point for probing the origin and early history of life at the molecular level.

Expression of a recoded nuclear gene inserted into yeast mitochondrial DNA is limited by mRNA-specific translational activation.

Genetic code differences prevent expression of nuclear genes within Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. To bridge this gap a synthetic gene, ARG8m, designed to specify an arginine biosynthetic enzyme when expressed inside mitochondria, has been inserted into yeast mtDNA in place of the COX3 structural gene. This mitochondrial cox3::ARG8m gene fully complements a nuclear arg8 deletion at the level of cell growth, and it is dependent for expression upon nuclear genes that encode subunits of the COX3 mRNA-specific translational activator. Thus, cox3::ARG8m serves as a mitochondrial reporter gene. Measurement of cox3::ARG8m expression at the levels of steady-state protein and enzymatic activity reveals that glucose repression operates within mitochondria. The levels of this reporter vary among strains whose nuclear genotypes lead to under- and overexpression of translational activator subunits, in particular Pet494p, indicating that mRNA-specific translational activation is a rate-limiting step in this organellar system. Whereas the steady-state level of cox3::ARG8m mRNA was also glucose repressed in an otherwise wild-type strain, absence of translational activation led to essentially repressed mRNA levels even under derepressing growth conditions. Thus, the mRNA is stabilized by translational activation, and variation in its level may be largely due to modulation of translation.

Genetic and Biochemical Characterization of the Yeast Spo12 Protein

We have performed a genetic and biochemical analysis of the SPO12 gene, which regulates meiotic nuclear divisions in budding yeast. When sporulated, spo12 mutants undergo a single meiotic nuclear division most closely resembling meiosis II. We observed that Spo12 protein is localized to the nucleus during both meiotic divisions and that Clb1-Cdc28, Clb3-Cdc28, Clb4-Cdc28, and Clb5-Cdc28 kinase activities during meiosis were not affected by a spo12 mutation. Using two-hybrid analysis, we identified several genes, three of which are meiotically induced, that may code for proteins that interact with Spo12p. We also observed that two genes, BNS1 (Bypasses Need for Spo12p), which has homology to SPO12, and SPO13, whose mutant phenotype is like that of spo12, can partially suppress the meiotic defect of spo12 mutants when overexpressed. We found that Spo12p is also localized to the nucleus in vegetative cells and that its level peaks during G2/M. We observed that a spo12 mutation is synthetically lethal in vegetative cells with a mutation in HCT1, a gene necessary for cells to exit mitosis, suggesting that Spo12p may have a role in exit from mitosis.