Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations. A case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000-2009.

This paper analyzes the relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations of computer science research activity. It analyzes the number of documents and citations and how they vary by number of authors. They are also analyzed (according to author set cardinality) under different circumstances, that is, when documents are written in different types of collaboration, when documents are published in different document types, when documents are published in different computer science subdisciplines, and, finally, when documents are published by journals with different impact factor quartiles. To investigate the above relationships, this paper analyzes the publications listed in the Web of Science and produced by active Spanish university professors between 2000 and 2009, working in the computer science field. Analyzing all documents, we show that the highest percentage of documents are published by three authors, whereas single-authored documents account for the lowest percentage. By number of citations, there is no positive association between the author cardinality and citation impact. Statistical tests show that documents written by two authors receive more citations per document and year than documents published by more authors. In contrast, results do not show statistically significant differences between documents published by two authors and one author. The research findings suggest that international collaboration results on average in publications with higher citation rates than national and institutional collaborations. We also find differences regarding citation rates between journals and conferences, across different computer science subdisciplines and journal quartiles as expected. Finally, our impression is that the collaborative level (number of authors per document) will increase in the coming years, and documents published by three or four authors will be the trend in computer science literature.

Teamwork competence and academic motivation in computer science engineering studies.

The present work is focused on studying two issues: the “teamwork” generic competence and the “academic motivation”. Currently the professional profile of engineers has a strong component of teamwork. On the other hand, motivational profile of students determines their tendencies when they come to work in team, as well as their performance at work. In this context we suggest four hypotheses: (H1) students improve their teamwork capacity by specific training and carrying out a set of activities integrated into an active learning process; (H2) students with higher mastery motivation have better attitude towards team working; (H3) students with higher mastery motivation obtain better results in academic performance; and (H4) students show different motivation profiles in different circumstances: type of courses, teaching methodologies, different times of the learning process. This study was carried out with computer science engineering students from two Spanish universities. The first results point to an improvement in teamwork competence of students if they have previously received specific training in facets of that competence. Other results indicate that there is a correlation between the motivational profiles of students and their perception about teamwork competence. Finally, and contrary to the initial hypothesis, these profiles appear to not influence significantly the academic performance of students.

Teamwork, motivational profiles and academic performance in computer science engineering

The present work is aimed at discussing several issues related to the teamwork generic competence, motivational profiles and academic performance. In particular, we study the improvement of teamwork attitude, the predominant types of motivation in different contexts and some correlations among these three components of the learning process. The above-mentioned aspects are of great importance. Currently, the professional profile of engineers has a strong teamwork component and the motivational profile of students determines both their tendencies when they come to work as part of a team, as well as their performance at work. Taking these issues into consideration, we suggest four hypotheses: (H1) students improve their teamwork capacity through specific training and carrying out of a set of activities integrated into an active learning process; (H2) students with higher mastery motivation have a better attitude towards teamwork; (H3) students with different types of motivations reach different levels of academic performance; and (H4) students show different motivation profiles in different circumstances: type of courses, teaching methodologies, different times of the learning process. This study was carried out with Computer Science Engineering students from two Spanish universities. The first results point to an improvement in teamwork competence of students if they have previously received specific training in facets of that competence. Other results indicate that there is a correlation between the motivational profiles of students and their perception of teamwork competence. Finally, results point to a clear relationship between some kind of motivation and academic performance. In particular, four kinds of motivation are analyzed and students are classified into two groups according to them. After analyzing several marks obtained in compulsory courses, we perceive that those students that show higher motivation for avoiding failure obtain, in general, worse academic performance.

Laboratorios virtuales y docencia de la automática en la formación tecnológica de base

Recientemente, ha surgido un interés por aprender a programar, debido a las oportunidades profesionales que da este tipo de estudios universitarios. Es fácil de entender porque el número de trabajos para programadores e ingenieros informáticos está creciendo rápidamente. Por otro lado, un amplio grupo de psicólogos opinan que el pensamiento computacional es una destreza fundamental para cualquiera, no sólo para los ingenieros informáticos. Para leer, escribir y realizar operaciones aritméticas, deberíamos utilizar el pensamiento computacional y por lo tanto, para desarrollar todas las habilidades analíticas de los niños. Es necesario cambiar los requerimientos de las destrezas necesarias para trabajar, los nuevos trabajadores necesitarán destrezas más sofisticadas en ciencias, matemáticas, ingeniería y tecnología. Consecuentemente, los contenidos sobre Tecnología de la Información tales como electrónica, programación, robótica y control se incrementan en la educación tecnológica en enseñanza secundaria. El desarrollo y utilización de los Laboratorios Virtuales de Control y Robótica ayuda a alcanzar este objetivo. Nos vamos a centrar en control y robótica porque un proyecto de control y robótica incluye contenidos de otras tecnologías tales como electrónica, programación, … Se ha implementado un sitio web con Laboratorios Virtuales de Control y Robótica. En este trabajo, se muestran seis grupos de laboratorios virtuales para la enseñanza del control y la robótica a niveles preuniversitarios. Estos laboratorios virtuales han sido usados para la docencia de alumnos de enseñanza secundaria. Las estadísticas del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje permiten validar ciertos aspectos de dicho trabajo. Se describen dichos laboratorios y la mejora del aprendizaje en cuanto a conocimientos procedimentales y conceptuales, así como la mejora de la interactividad respecto al aprendizaje con análogas aplicaciones con objetivos de aprendizaje idénticos, pero careciendo de la componente de laboratorio virtual. Se explican algunas de las experiencias realizadas con los alumnos. Los resultados sugieren, que dentro de la educación tecnológica de la educación secundaria, los laboratorios virtuales pueden ser explotados como un efectivo y motivacional entorno de aprendizaje. ABSTRACT Recently, there has been a surge of interest in learning to code, focusing especially on career opportunities. It is easy to understand why: the number of jobs for programmers and computer scientists is growing rapidly. On the other hand, the psychologists think that computational thinking is a fundamental skill for everyone, not just for computer scientists. To reading, writing, and arithmetic, we should add computational thinking to every child’s analytical ability. It is necessary to change workforce requirements mean that new workers will need ever more sophisticated skills in science, mathematics, engineering and technology. Consequently, the contents about Information Technology as well as electronics, coding, robotics and control increase in Technology Education in High School . The development and utilization of the Virtual Laboratories of Control and Robotics help to achieve this goal. We focus on control and robotics because a control and robotics project includes other technologies contents like electronics, coding,... A web site with Virtual Laboratories of Control and Robotics was implemented. In this work, six groups of virtual laboratories for teaching control and robotics in preuniversity level are shown. These Virtual Laboratories were used for teaching students at high school. The statistics of teaching-learning process allow to check some issues of this work. The laboratories, the improvement of learning (concepts and procedures) and interactivity are described and are compared to similar applications. They share identical learning objectives but they lack the virtual laboratory aspect. Some experiences with students are explained too. The results suggest that within high school technology education, virtual laboratories can be exploited as effective and motivational learning environments.