Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double-blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens


Autoria(s): Senni, M.; McMurray, John J. V.; Wachter, R.; McIntyre, H. F.; Reyes, A.; Majercak, I.; Andreka, P.; Shehova-Yankova, Nina; Anand, I.; Yilmaz, M. B.; Gogia, H.; Martínez Sellés Oliveria Soares, Manuel; Fischer, S.; Zilahi, Z.; Cosmi, F.; Gelev, V.; Galve Basilio, Enrique; Gómez Doblas, J. J.; Nociar, J.; Radomska, M.; Sokolova, B.; Volterrani, M.; Sarkar, A.; Reimund, B.; Chen, F.; Charney, A.
Data(s)

14/12/2016

14/12/2016

2016

Resumo

The aim is tassess the tolerability of initiating/uptitrating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) from 50 to 200 mg twice daily (target dose) over 3 and 6 weeks in heart failure (HF) patients (ejection fraction ≤35%). A 5-day open-label run-in (sacubitril/valsartan 50 mg twice daily) preceded an 11-week, double-blind, randomization period [100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 200 mg twice daily (‘condensed’ regimen) vs. 50 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 200 mg twice daily (‘conservative’ regimen)]. Patients were stratified by pre-study dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; low-dose stratum included ACEI/ARB-naïve patients). Of 540 patients entering run-in, 498 (92%) were randomized and 429 (86.1% of randomized) completed the study. Pre-defined tolerability criteria were hypotension, renal dysfunction and hyperkalaemia; and adjudicated angioedema, which occurred in (‘condensed’ vs. ‘conservative’) 9.7% vs. 8.4% (P = 0.570), 7.3% vs. 7.6% (P = 0.990), 7.7% vs. 4.4% (P = 0.114), and 0.0% vs. 0.8% of patients, respectively. Corresponding proportions for pre-defined systolic blood pressure <95 mmHg, serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L, and serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dL were 8.9% vs. 5.2% (P = 0.102), 7.3% vs. 4.0% (P = 0.097), and 0.4% vs. 0%, respectively. In total, 378 (76%) patients achieved and maintained sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily without dose interruption/down-titration over 12 weeks (77.8% vs. 84.3% for ‘condensed’ vs. ‘conservative’; P = 0.078). Rates by ACEI/ARB pre-study dose stratification were 82.6% vs. 83.8% (P = 0.783) for high-dose/‘condensed’ vs. high-dose/‘conservative’ and 84.9% vs. 73.6% (P = 0.030) for low-dose/‘conservative’ vs. low-dose/‘condensed’. Initiation/uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan from 50 to 200 mg twice daily over 3 or 6 weeks had a tolerability profile in line with other HF treatments. More gradual initiation/uptitration maximized attainment of target dose in the low-dose ACEI/ARB group.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, USA

5.135 JCR (2015) Q1, 17/124 Cardiac and cardiovascular systems

UEM

Identificador

Senni, M., McMurray, J. J., Wachter, R., McIntyre, H. F., Reyes, A., Majercak, I., ... & Gogia, H. (2016). Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double‐blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens. European journal of heart failure, 18(9), 1193–1202. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.548

13889842

18790844

http://hdl.handle.net/11268/6090

10.1002/ejhf.548

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES

openAccess

Palavras-Chave #Insuficiencia cardíaca #Corazón - Enfermedades #Enfermedad cardiovascular
Tipo

article