Nurse-led group consultation intervention reduces depressive symptoms in men with localised prostate cancer: a cluster randomised controlled trial


Autoria(s): Schofield, Penelope; Gough, Karla; Lotfi-Jam, Kerryann; Bergin, Rebecca; Ugalde, Anna; Dudgeon, Paul; Crellin, Wallace; Schubach, Kathryn; Foroudi, Farshard; Tai, Keen Hun; Duchesne, Gillian; Sanson-Fisher, Rob; Aranda, Sanchia
Data(s)

16/08/2016

Resumo

<b>BACKGROUND:</b> Radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer has many known and distressing side effects. The efficacy of group interventions for reducing psychological morbidity is lacking. This study investigated the relative benefits of a group nurse-led intervention on psychological morbidity, unmet needs, treatment-related concerns and prostate cancer-specific quality of life in men receiving curative intent radiotherapy for prostate cancer. <br /><br /><b>METHODS:</b> This phase III, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial included 331 men (consent rate: 72 %; attrition: 5 %) randomised to the intervention (<i>n</i> = 166) or usual care (<i>n</i> = 165). The intervention comprised four group and one individual consultation all delivered by specialist uro-oncology nurses. Primary outcomes were anxious and depressive symptoms as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Unmet needs were assessed with the Supportive Care Needs Survey-SF34 Revised, treatment-related concerns with the Cancer Treatment Scale and quality of life with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index -26. Assessments occurred before, at the end of and 6 months post-radiotherapy. Primary outcome analysis was by intention-to-treat and performed by fitting a linear mixed model to each outcome separately using all observed data. <br /><br /><b>RESULTS:</b> Mixed models analysis indicated that group consultations had a significant beneficial effect on one of two primary endpoints, depressive symptoms (<i>p</i> = 0.009), and one of twelve secondary endpoints, procedural concerns related to cancer treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.049). Group consultations did not have a significant beneficial effect on generalised anxiety, unmet needs and prostate cancer-specific quality of life. <br /><br /><b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> Compared with individual consultations offered as part of usual care, the intervention provides a means of delivering patient education and is associated with modest reductions in depressive symptoms and procedural concerns. Future work should seek to confirm the clinical feasibility and cost-effectiveness of group interventions.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30086129

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

BioMed Central

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30086129/ugalde-nurseledgroup-2016.pdf

http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2687-1

Direitos

2016, The Authors

Palavras-Chave #prostate cancer #radiotherapy #intervention #unmet needs #psychological morbidity #quality of life #uro-oncology nurses #Science & Technology #Life Sciences & Biomedicine #Oncology #QUALITY-OF-LIFE #BEHAVIORAL STRESS-MANAGEMENT #DISTRESS #CARCINOMA #DIAGNOSIS #ANXIETY #SKILLS #NEEDS
Tipo

Journal Article