Clustering of adherence to personalised dietary recommendations and changes in healthy eating index within the Food4Me study


Autoria(s): Livingstone, Katherine M.; Celis-Morales, Carlos; Lara, Jose; Woolhead, Clara; O'Donovan, Clare B.; Forster, Hannah; Marsaux, Cyril F. M.; Macready, Anna L.; Fallaize, Rosalind; Navas-Carretero, Santiago; San-Cristobal, Rodrigo; Kolossa, Silvia; Tsirigoti, Lydia; Lambrinou, Christina P.; Moschonis, George; Surwiłło, Agnieszka; Drevon, Christian A.; Manios, Yannis; Traczyk, Iwona; Gibney, Eileen R.; Brennan, Lorraine; Walsh, Marianne C.; Lovegrove, Julie A.; Martinez, J. Alfredo; Saris, Wim H. M.; Daniel, Hannelore; Gibney, Mike; Mathers, John C.
Data(s)

01/12/2016

Resumo

OBJECTIVE: To characterise clusters of individuals based on adherence to dietary recommendations and to determine whether changes in Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores in response to a personalised nutrition (PN) intervention varied between clusters. <br /><br />DESIGN: Food4Me study participants were clustered according to whether their baseline dietary intakes met European dietary recommendations. Changes in HEI scores between baseline and month 6 were compared between clusters and stratified by whether individuals received generalised or PN advice. <br /><br />SETTING: Pan-European, Internet-based, 6-month randomised controlled trial. <br /><br />SUBJECTS: Adults aged 18-79 years (n 1480). <br /><br />RESULTS: Individuals in cluster 1 (C1) met all recommended intakes except for red meat, those in cluster 2 (C2) met two recommendations, and those in cluster 3 (C3) and cluster 4 (C4) met one recommendation each. C1 had higher intakes of white fish, beans and lentils and low-fat dairy products and lower percentage energy intake from SFA (P<0·05). C2 consumed less chips and pizza and fried foods than C3 and C4 (P<0·05). C1 were lighter, had lower BMI and waist circumference than C3 and were more physically active than C4 (P<0·05). More individuals in C4 were smokers and wanted to lose weight than in C1 (P<0·05). Individuals who received PN advice in C4 reported greater improvements in HEI compared with C3 and C1 (P<0·05). <br /><br />CONCLUSIONS: The cluster where the fewest recommendations were met (C4) reported greater improvements in HEI following a 6-month trial of PN whereas there was no difference between clusters for those randomised to the Control, non-personalised dietary intervention.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30085468

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Cambridge University Press

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30085468/livingstone-clusteringof-2016.pdf

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30085468/livingstone-clusteringofadh-inpress-2016.pdf

http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016001932

Direitos

2016, The Authors

Palavras-Chave #Clustering #Dietary recommendations #Healthy Eating Index #Personalised nutrition
Tipo

Journal Article