The diagnostic interview for psychoses (DIP): development, reliability and applications


Autoria(s): Castle, D. J.; Jablensky, A.; McGrath, J. J.; Carr, V.; Morgan, V.; Waterreus, A.; Valuri, G.; Stain, H.; McGuffin, P.; Farmer, A.
Contribuinte(s)

E. Paykel

K. Kendler

Data(s)

01/01/2006

Resumo

Background. We describe the development, reliability and applications of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychoses (DIP), a comprehensive interview schedule for psychotic disorders. Method. The DIP is intended for use by interviewers with a clinical background and was designed to occupy the middle ground between fully structured, lay-administered schedules, and semi-structured., psychiatrist-administered interviews. It encompasses four main domains: (a) demographic data; (b) social functioning and disability; (c) a diagnostic module comprising symptoms, signs and past history ratings; and (d) patterns of service utilization Lind patient-perceived need for services. It generates diagnoses according to several sets of criteria using the OPCRIT computerized diagnostic algorithm and can be administered either on-screen or in a hard-copy format. Results. The DIP proved easy to use and was well accepted in the field. For the diagnostic module, inter-rater reliability was assessed on 20 cases rated by 24 clinicians: good reliability was demonstrated for both ICD-10 and DSM-III-R diagnoses. Seven cases were interviewed 2-11 weeks apart to determine test-retest reliability, with pairwise agreement of 0.8-1.0 for most items. Diagnostic validity was assessed in 10 cases, interviewed with the DIP and using the SCAN as 'gold standard': in nine cases clinical diagnoses were in agreement. Conclusions. The DIP is suitable for use in large-scale epidemiological studies of psychotic disorders. as well as in smaller Studies where time is at a premium. While the diagnostic module stands on its own, the full DIP schedule, covering demography, social functioning and service utilization makes it a versatile multi-purpose tool.

Identificador

http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:81024

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Cambridge University Press

Palavras-Chave #Psychiatry #Psychology #Psychology, Clinical #Australian National Survey #Clinical-assessment #Risk-factors #Disorders #Schizophrenia #Criteria #Illness #Prevalence #Disability #Validity #C1 #321204 Mental Health #730211 Mental health
Tipo

Journal Article