Using clinical indicators in a quality improvement programme targeting cardiac care


Autoria(s): Hickey, Annabel; Scott, Ian; Denaro, Charles; Stewart, Neil; Bennett, Cameron; Theile, Therese
Contribuinte(s)

R. H. Palmer

Data(s)

01/01/2004

Resumo

Rationale. The Brisbane Cardiac Consortium, a quality improvement collaboration of clinicians from three hospitals and five divisions of general practice, developed and reported clinical indicators as measures of the quality of care received by patients with acute coronary syndromes or congestive heart failure. Development of indicators. An expert panel derived indicators that measured gaps between evidence and practice. Data collected from hospital records and general practice heart-check forms were used to calculate process and outcome indicators for each condition. Our indicators were reliable (kappa scores 0.7-1.0) and widely accepted by clinicians as having face validity. Independent review of indicator-failed, in-hospital cases revealed that, for 27 of 28 process indicators, clinically legitimate reasons for withholding specific interventions were found in

Identificador

http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:70232

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Oxford University Press

Palavras-Chave #Health Care Sciences & Services #Health Policy & Services #Cardiac #Clinical Indicators #Performance Measures #Quality Improvement #Acute Myocardial-infarction #Congestive-heart-failure #Of-care #Performance-measurement #Practice Guidelines #Improving Quality #Health-care #Management #Project #College #C1 #321208 Primary Health Care #730217 Health status (e.g. indicators of well-being)
Tipo

Journal Article