Tungsten coil atomic emission spectrometry combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction: A synergistic association for chromium determination in water samples


Autoria(s): Vidal, Lorena; Silva, Sidnei G.; Canals Hernández, Antonio; Nóbrega, Joaquim A.
Contribuinte(s)

Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición y Bromatología

Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Universitario de Materiales

Espectroscopía Atómica-Masas y Química Analítica en Condiciones Extremas

Data(s)

02/12/2015

02/12/2015

01/02/2016

Resumo

A novel and environment friendly analytical method is reported for total chromium determination and chromium speciation in water samples, whereby tungsten coil atomic emission spectrometry (WCAES) is combined with in situ ionic liquid formation dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (in situ IL-DLLME). A two stage multivariate optimization approach has been developed employing a Plackett–Burman design for screening and selection of the significant factor involved in the in situ IL-DLLME procedure, which was later optimized by means of a circumscribed central composite design. The optimum conditions were complexant concentration: 0.5% (or 0.1%); complexant type: DDTC; IL anion: View the MathML sourcePF6−; [Hmim][Cl] IL amount: 60 mg; ionic strength: 0% NaCl; pH: 5 (or 2); centrifugation time: 10 min; and centrifugation speed: 1000 rpm. Under the optimized experimental conditions the method was evaluated and proper linearity was obtained with a correlation coefficient of 0.991 (5 calibration standards). Limits of detection and quantification for both chromium species were 3 and 10 µg L−1, respectively. This is a 233-fold improvement when compared with chromium determination by WCAES without using preconcentration. The repeatability of the proposed method was evaluated at two different spiking levels (10 and 50 µg L−1) obtaining coefficients of variation of 11.4% and 3.6% (n=3), respectively. A certified reference material (SRM-1643e NIST) was analyzed in order to determine the accuracy of the method for total chromium determination and 112.3% and 2.5 µg L−1 were the recovery (trueness) and standard deviation values, respectively. Tap, bottled mineral and natural mineral water samples were analyzed at 60 µg L−1 spiking level of total Cr content at two Cr(VI)/Cr(III) ratios, and relative recovery values ranged between 88% and 112% showing that the matrix has a negligible effect. To our knowledge, this is the first time that combines in situ IL-DLLME and WCAES.

The authors would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Project no. CTQ2011-23968), Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (Project no. PHB2010-0018-PC), Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) (Project no. ACOMP/2013/072), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior in Brazil (Grant CAPES-DGU n. 243/11). L. Vidal also thanks the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport for her travel Grant (HBP-2010-0030) and S.G. Silva is grateful to the Grant 2011/13288-7, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).

Identificador

Talanta. 2016, 148: 602-608. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2015.04.023

0039-9140 (Print)

1873-3573 (Online)

http://hdl.handle.net/10045/51806

10.1016/j.talanta.2015.04.023

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.04.023

Direitos

© 2015 Elsevier B.V.

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess

Palavras-Chave #Atomic emission #Chromium #Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction #Ionic liquids #Speciation #Tungsten coil atomizer #Water samples #Nutrición y Bromatología #Química Analítica
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article